xchain coverage parity: full Wormhole chain set on all 4 e2e benches - #1481
Merged
Conversation
…perlane/Axelar specs where supported (46 new providers total)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Aligns provider coverage with the Wormhole reference bench (20 chains) so a reader comparing across benches sees the same chain set on each row. Providers with 0 samples are auto-hidden by the quorum guard until data arrives.
CCIP +12: berachain, celo, ink, linea, mantle, monad, moonbeam, optimism, scroll, solana, unichain, world-chain
LayerZero +11: berachain, celo, injective, ink, linea, mantle, moonbeam, scroll, sui, unichain, world-chain
Hyperlane +14: avalanche, berachain, bnb, celo, injective, ink, linea, mantle, moonbeam, optimism, scroll, solana, unichain, world-chain
Axelar +9: arbitrum, avalanche, bnb, celo, injective, linea, mantle, optimism, scroll
Chains a protocol does not officially support are omitted (e.g. Axelar does not have Solana mainnet, Sui, Aptos; Hyperlane does not have Sui; etc.). Meta-bench aggregate remains protocol-level, unaffected.
Coverage counts after this PR: