Conversation
|
Build failures are due to a dependency not downloading - hopefully temporary problem. |
|
Build and test is now OK. Is the 'do not merge' label related to this, or something else? |
|
Code changes look fine. |
|
Something else. I need more tests. |
|
It looks like the new code doesn't warn on non-existent atoms anymore - the failing diff is in lexical.tst output - the old code prints a warning about C(128). The line looks strange though - what's the meaning of the next atom C(2,128)? Comparing files lexical.out and MIN64GHGUI.ORG/LEXICAL.OUT |
|
I fixed the warning on non-existing atom. |
|
The piece of work left is this I can work out most of the cases except this one:
The current syntax analyser would probably interpret this as a valid multiplication so will keep the current behaviour. The rest is:
I wondering if 2. and 3. is already possible. I have not checked yet. |
… it anyway (current behaviour)
This reverts commit 5cdfdd3.
|
rebased branch with master |
No description provided.