π‘οΈ Sentinel: [security improvement] Add Command Injection and Hardcoded Password rules#100
Conversation
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
OpenCode Review Overview
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OpenCode Agent approved this PR.
The PR adds new security scanner rules for command injection and hardcoded passwords, addressing critical OWASP vulnerabilities. The changes are well-documented and align with the project's security goals.
- Result: APPROVE
- Reason: No blockers found in the changes.
- Head SHA:
1faf3a2ec9b5c19fe8a74f8f16f90ee73675ddf2 - Workflow run: 27861368599
- Workflow attempt: 1
π¨ Severity: HIGH
π‘ Vulnerability: Missing detection rules for Command Injection (OWASP A03) and hardcoded passwords (OWASP A07).
π― Impact: AI-generated code could introduce command injection vulnerabilities or hardcode passwords without the
vibesecscanner flagging them, putting projects at risk.π§ Fix: Added
node-command-injection,python-command-injection, andhardcoded-passwordrules toSCAN_RULESinscanner/cli/vibesec.py. Updated.jules/sentinel.mdjournal.β Verification: Ran
vibesec scan .locally and verified the new patterns are matched and appropriately flagged. RanPYTHONPATH=. pytest tests/with zero regressions.PR created automatically by Jules for task 13359863990700178971 started by @seonghobae