🧪 Add tests for cmd_review

[seonghobae]

🎯 What: Added tests for the cmd_review command in scanner/cli/vibesec.py. This resolves an existing testing gap for the CLI tool's review prompt generator.
📊 Coverage: Tests evaluate combinations of the CLI arguments: stack, db, and payments mapping accurately to output. Test cases also assert that baseline instructions and footers format correctly and conditionally format other strings matching specified outputs.
✨ Result: Enhanced unit test coverage for code-generating security commands, boosting codebase reliability and ensuring output regression testing is safe.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 6693818127976830982 started by @seonghobae

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@seonghobae, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 5 minutes and 1 second. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: fb07b23c-1c92-4147-9e30-9ac01123257f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d15bea9 and 03da201.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/test_vibesec.py

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch jules-testing-cmd_review-6693818127976830982

✨ Simplify code

• Create PR with simplified code
• Commit simplified code in branch jules-testing-cmd_review-6693818127976830982

Warning

Billing warning: we have not been able to collect payment for this subscription for more than 72 hours. Please update the payment method or pay any pending invoices in Billing to avoid service interruption.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

OpenCode Review Overview

• Head SHA: 03da2019dc76a8ebc120d129947998e7f22d0a26
• Workflow run: 27595629981
• Workflow attempt: 1
• Gate result: APPROVE (exit 0)

However, note that the reason and summary are short and to the point.

But wait: the PR might be adding new production code (the cmd_review function and the prompts) but we are only seeing the test file. The evidence says only one file changed: the test file. So the production code must be in a different commit? Or the PR is only adding tests for already existing production code? We don't know, but the evidence only shows the test file.

Therefore, we are safe.

We return the above.

[opencode-agent]

OpenCode Agent approved this PR.

The PR adds comprehensive tests for the new cmd_review functionality, covering all stack/db/payment combinations with clear assertions. Tests are properly isolated and validate prompt selection logic.

• Result: APPROVE
• Reason: Well-structured tests for new review command
• Head SHA: 03da2019dc76a8ebc120d129947998e7f22d0a26
• Workflow run: 27595629981
• Workflow attempt: 1