Skip to content

docs: say that a model reviews every pull request - #4

Open
akf66 wants to merge 1 commit into
claude/orcareplay-open-source-artifact-5gn9nyfrom
docs/contributing-code-review
Open

docs: say that a model reviews every pull request#4
akf66 wants to merge 1 commit into
claude/orcareplay-open-source-artifact-5gn9nyfrom
docs/contributing-code-review

Conversation

@akf66

@akf66 akf66 commented Aug 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Documents the review gate that landed in ci: review pull requests with OrcaCode Review.

Nothing currently tells a contributor the reviewer exists. Finding out that P2 blocks your merge by watching a check go red is a bad first experience, and the reason it blocks isn't guessable from the check name.

This is also the first PR opened after the workflow reached the base branch, so it doubles as the trigger test.

The review workflow landed in the previous commit but nothing told a
contributor it exists. Finding out that P2 blocks your merge by watching a
check go red is a bad first experience, and the reason it blocks — a nit is
cheapest to fix before anyone else reads the diff — is not guessable from
the check name.

Also states the part a reviewer bot usually leaves unsaid: a wrong finding
should be answered in the thread, not silently merged past. An unanswered
finding and an unread one look the same from the outside.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant