Skip to content

Update gitignore with additional Copado elements#1

Open
delokoni wants to merge 1 commit intoCopadoSolutions:masterfrom
delokoni:patch-1
Open

Update gitignore with additional Copado elements#1
delokoni wants to merge 1 commit intoCopadoSolutions:masterfrom
delokoni:patch-1

Conversation

@delokoni
Copy link
Copy Markdown

To avoid deployment errors due to Copado Managed Package elements, more metadata types were added to the gitignore file.

To avoid deployment errors due to Copado Managed Package elements, more metadata types were added to the gitignore file.
workflows/copado__*
objects/copado__*
objectTranslations/copado__*
layouts/copado__*
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@drcopa drcopa Nov 15, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some customers personalize Copado in Sandboxes and then deploy the changes using Copado. I originally included some of these lines in the gitignore but customers opened cases because Copado changes in objects/layouts did not appear when committing them to Git. To avoid these type of cases we only included metadata types in the gitignore that cannot be modified in Managed Packages (apex classes, etc).
I would do the same in your changes, only leave the ones that cannot be modified.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds fair.
Maybe include the rest commented with a note

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah that would be good!

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what about something like:

classes/*__*
triggers/*__*
pages/*__*
components/*__*

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants