Skip to content

chore(lifecycle): archive add-a-hi-check-gate-to-ci (do not merge until archive tip) - #791

Merged
0xLeif merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
recover-787-archive
Sep 19, 2026
Merged

0xLeif merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
recover-787-archive

Conversation

@0xLeif

@0xLeif 0xLeif commented Sep 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Do not merge this draft until the archive tip is on the branch

#790 was squash-merged at the product tip, before change ship could push the archive. That left add-a-hi-check-gate-to-ci active on main again.

This PR re-runs change check --commit on current main. After CI is green I will record review, change ship, and push the archive commit. Then it can be marked ready and merged.

Merging the product tip alone repeats the stranding.

Test Plan

  • Lifecycle gate + Trust green on the product tip
  • Archive tip present under .specsync/archive/changes/
  • No active workspace under .specsync/changes/add-a-hi-check-gate-to-ci/
  • specsync change audit --strict passes with 0 active changes

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Corvin says...

      _
    <(^\  .oO(Caw! ^v^)
     |/(\
      \(\\
      " "\\

"Caw! Found a shiny new spec!"

CI Summary

Check Status
Validate action.yml ✅ Passed
Packaged Action Consumer ⏭️ Not selected
Dependency Audit ⏭️ Not selected
Code Coverage ⏭️ Not selected
Format Check ⏭️ Not selected
Human intent check ⏭️ Not selected
Docs Site ⏭️ Not selected
Spec Validation ✅ Passed
Tests (build, test, clippy) ⏭️ Not selected
VS Code Extension ⏭️ Not selected
📋 Spec Validation Details

✅ SpecSync: Passed

Metric Value
Specs checked 62
Passed 62
Errors 0
Warnings 0
File coverage 100% (107/107)
LOC coverage 100% (148547/148547)

Generated by specsync · Run specsync check --format github to reproduce


Powered by corvid-pet

Finalize SpecSync package after scoped review; archive-before-merge for #791.
@0xLeif
0xLeif marked this pull request as ready for review September 19, 2026 17:59
@0xLeif
0xLeif requested a review from a team as a code owner September 19, 2026 17:59
@0xLeif
0xLeif requested review from 0xGaspar, Kyntrin and tofu-ux and removed request for a team September 19, 2026 17:59
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-19T18:01:44.934778Z 546bca3 Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@0xLeif
0xLeif merged commit 4b06c5b into main Sep 19, 2026
22 checks passed
@0xLeif
0xLeif deleted the recover-787-archive branch September 19, 2026 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant