-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
TST: cover the paths excluded by coverage pragmas #785
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: DASDAE/dascore
Length of output: 152
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: DASDAE/dascore
Length of output: 2990
Use an explicit runtime check instead of
assert.assertstatements are skipped underpython -O, so a non-overlappinglo > hiinterval would fall through and append an invalid member row instead of failing.Proposed fix
Add a regression test for this path with optimization enabled.
📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Keeping the assert, deliberately.
The
-Obehaviour is real, but this is an internal invariant of the partitioner rather than validation of anything a caller supplies: sources within a partition are continuous (partitioning splits on gaps) and start-corrected, sosearchsortedcannot offer a source disjoint from its output. That is the case asserts exist for, and it holds across the full suite (8229 tests).An explicit
raisewould need its own coverage exclusion, since the raising line still never executes — which is what this PR set out to remove. A test could only reach it by handing_build_membersa state the public API cannot produce, and @codex rightly pushed back on exactly that earlier in this PR (see the_build_membersthread), since.agents/agents.mdasks for boundary tests rather than implementation-detail tests.One thing your comment did surface: dropping the old
continuemeans that under-Oan impossible state would append an invalid row instead of being skipped. Worth stating plainly rather than leaving implied — though it trades a check on an unreachable state for a clearer statement of the invariant, and skipping silently would have lost a source's data anyway.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To use Codex here, create an environment for this repo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.