Remove obsolete remark in resourcepolicies.md #308
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kshepherd
added
documentation
kshepherd
added
the
1 APPROVAL
kshepherd
changed the title
tdonohue
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2025
Member
tdonohue
left a comment
tdonohue
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Thanks @kshepherd . At a glance, this looks correct to me.
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from 👍 Reviewer Approved
to ✅ Done
in DSpace 9.0 Release
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes DSpace/DSpace#10609
I have confirmed that the PUT operations are supported by the REST API and UI.
I have also confirmed this is true for dspace-8_x, so it should be backported for 8.
The conflicting remarks (with PUT description) also exist in dspace-7_x version of the REST contract, so I think this should also be backported to 7.