Prepare RouteForge v0.1.0-alpha: CI, README and demo-mode UI - #11
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
v0.1.0-alphaby hardening CI, surfacing demo-mode in the UI and docs, and adding concise usage examples.Description
.github/workflows/ci.ymlthat runs backend tests with Python 3.12 and builds the frontend with Node 22, usingnpm ciwhenpackage-lock.jsonexists andnpm installotherwise.ReportViewdemo-mode banner to a more prominent warning which is only shown whenreport.details.demo_mode === true.README.mdtoRouteForge v0.1.0-alpha, add aTypische Nutzungsection with three concretecurlexamples (prefix check, ASN check, ASN-RPKI batch), clarifyDemo-Modususage, and expand the status explanations forOK,WARNING,CRITICAL, andUNKNOWN.details.demo_modefor checks and the ASN-RPKI batch status logic meets requirements (CRITICAL > WARNING > OK, UNKNOWN when no prefixes, API errors treated as warnings), so no behavioral changes to existing endpoints were made.Testing
cd backend && pytest -q, which completed successfully (16 passed, 20 warnings).cd frontend && npm run build, which succeeded (production build completed).pytest -q, frontendnpm ci/npm install+npm run build).Codex Task