You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Financial decisions are made under uncertainty. This project applies
Monte Carlo simulation — a powerful quantitative finance technique — to
model portfolio risk, revenue scenarios and investment decisions across
10,000 simulated outcomes, enabling data driven risk aware decision making.
🎯 Project Objectives
Simulate stock portfolio performance under uncertainty
Calculate Value at Risk (VaR) at 95% and 99% confidence levels
Model 3 year revenue scenarios with probability distributions
Compare risk vs return across investment strategies
Quantify probability of financial outcomes
📊 Simulation Parameters
Parameter
Value
Simulations Run
10,000 iterations
Portfolio Stocks
3 assets
Trading Days
252 (1 year)
Initial Investment
$100,000
Base Revenue
$5,000,000
Forecast Horizon
3 years
📈 Simulation Results
💼 Portfolio Simulation
Metric
Value
Average Portfolio Value
$112,375.52
Median Portfolio Value
$111,539.76
Standard Deviation
$13,389.81
Best Case Outcome
+$87,714.10
Worst Case Outcome
-$26,803.41
⚠️ Value at Risk (VaR)
Confidence Level
Maximum Loss
VaR 95%
-$7,874.24
VaR 99%
-$14,429.20
📊 3 Year Revenue Scenarios
Scenario
Revenue
Base Revenue
$5,000,000
Average Forecast
$6,655,143
Optimistic (95th)
$8,090,967
Pessimistic (5th)
$5,323,249
Probability of Growth
98.3%
🔬 Methodology
1️⃣ Portfolio Simulation
Modeled 3 stocks with different risk/return profiles
Simulated 252 daily returns using normal distribution
Applied geometric Brownian motion for price paths
Aggregated 10,000 portfolio outcomes
2️⃣ Value at Risk (VaR)
Calculated VaR at 95% and 99% confidence levels
VaR represents maximum expected loss under normal conditions
Used historical simulation approach with Monte Carlo
3️⃣ Revenue Scenario Analysis
Simulated 3 year revenue growth under uncertainty
Applied random normal distribution to annual growth rates
Identified optimistic, pessimistic and base case scenarios
4️⃣ Investment Decision Analysis
Compared Growth vs Conservative investment strategies
Quantified risk adjusted returns for each option
Calculated probability of positive returns
🔍 Key Insights
💰 Portfolio Performance
Average portfolio grows from $100,000 to $112,375 (+12.4%)
95% confidence maximum loss limited to $7,874
99% confidence maximum loss limited to $14,429
Strong positive skew indicates more upside than downside
📊 Revenue Outlook
98.3% probability of revenue growth over 3 years
Average 3 year revenue of $6.66M vs base of $5M (+33%)
Optimistic scenario reaches $8.09M (+62% growth)
Even pessimistic scenario shows modest growth to $5.32M
⚖️ Risk vs Return
Portfolio standard deviation of $13,390 shows manageable risk
Growth investment offers higher return with proportionally higher risk
Conservative investment provides more predictable outcomes
Diversification across 3 assets reduces overall portfolio volatility
💡 Business Recommendations
Proceed with growth strategy — 98.3% probability of revenue increase
Set risk limits using VaR — maximum acceptable loss at 99% = $14,429
Plan for pessimistic scenario — budget should account for $5.32M floor
This project demonstrates quantitative finance expertise combined with
statistical simulation skills, delivering risk insights suitable for
Quantitative Analyst, Risk Analyst, FP&A and Data Science roles.
All simulations use synthetic financial parameters for demonstration purposes.
---
About
Monte Carlo simulation for financial risk analysis, portfolio optimization and revenue forecasting under uncertainty using Python and numpy.