Skip to content

test: Shrink the spec-scan used in system tests - #1608

Merged
fajinyuan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
system-test-runtime
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

fajinyuan merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
system-test-runtime

Conversation

@tpoliaw

@tpoliaw tpoliaw commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The test still covers all the same code paths but running a smaller
scan with the simulated motors takes much less time.

As this is one of the longest tests in the system test suite, the
runtime is reduced significantly. On this machine, the run time drops
from ~1m to ~15s.

The test still covers all the same code paths but running a smaller
scan with the simulated motors takes much less time.

As this is one of the longest tests in the system test suite, the
runtime is reduced significantly. On this machine, the run time drops
from ~1m to ~15s.
@tpoliaw
tpoliaw requested a review from a team as a code owner August 4, 2026 12:46
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.96%. Comparing base (9a145e9) to head (92dd9af).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1608   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.96%   95.96%           
=======================================
  Files          45       45           
  Lines        3317     3317           
=======================================
  Hits         3183     3183           
  Misses        134      134           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@fajinyuan
fajinyuan added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 5, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 5fecc1e Aug 5, 2026
19 checks passed
@fajinyuan
fajinyuan deleted the system-test-runtime branch August 5, 2026 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants