fix: drop em dashes reintroduced by #163 in audit/review skills#179
Merged
Conversation
#163 clarified the audit/review Boundaries scope but reintroduced em dashes, which this repo deliberately purged (commit 88431de "replace em dashes with plain punctuation across prose"). Keeps the clearer wording, swaps the em dash for a period. .openclaw mirrors regenerated; suite green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#163 clarified the ponytail-audit/review scope wording (good) but put em dashes back into the skill files, which the repo deliberately removed in
88431de. Keeps the clearer wording, swaps the em dash for a period, regenerates the.openclawmirrors. 56/56, mirror synced.🤖 Generated with Claude Code