Improve C# Code Generator to use Roslyn SyntaxFactory instead of basic string concatenation #43
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rudyhuyn
changed the title
Contributor
|
This PR just made the generator much, much slower and less efficient. It is highly discouraged to use syntax factory APIs to create source generator text, as they're orders of magnitude slower than just building a string. See: dotnet/roslyn#52914 (comment). You should copy the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR refactors the C# code generator to use Roslyn’s SyntaxFactory API instead of manually concatenating strings to build C# source files.