Skip to content

docs(openspec): archive npm ghost probe fix#401

Merged
Drswith merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/archive-fix-npm-ghost-probe-false-positive
Jul 1, 2026
Merged

docs(openspec): archive npm ghost probe fix#401
Drswith merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/archive-fix-npm-ghost-probe-false-positive

Conversation

@Drswith

@Drswith Drswith commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Archive completed OpenSpec changes fix-npm-ghost-probe-false-positive after their implementation PRs merged, and close the agent-driven archive follow-up with repository validation.

Linked Artifacts

Validation

  • bun run openspec:validate
  • bun run memory:check
  • bun run lint
  • bun run format:check
  • bun run typecheck
  • bun run test (if behavior changed)
  • Not run, explained below

Release Intent

  • Release: not applicable - OpenSpec archive closure only

Docs Updated

  • Not needed
  • docs/...
  • openspec/...
  • Follow-up issue or OpenSpec change created instead

Scope Check

  • I did not add a new ad hoc root-level Markdown file.
  • I updated the relevant issue, ADR, spec, runbook, or captured the missing doc work as follow-up.
  • I did not silently expand project scope without recording it explicitly.

Closure Check

  • Working tree was clean before archive closure started.
  • Branch was pushed and this PR is the active delivery artifact.
  • OpenSpec change is already archived or queued for agent-driven archive closure.
  • Release is not applicable, delegated to release automation, or verified.

Notes

  • Generated by bun run openspec:archive-closure.
  • Synced the accepted npm inconclusive-probe scenario additively into openspec/specs/agent-update/spec.md before archive delivery.
  • Local bun run test was not repeated because this PR only moves OpenSpec artifacts and syncs the accepted spec; the PR CI test matrix passed on all platforms.

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Governance — archive closure

Verdict: Non-blocking archive closure. Spec sync is additive and matches the archived change delta. CI is green. No approval.

OpenSpec

  • Archive follow-up is correctly scoped: implementation landed in #399; this PR syncs the accepted delta into openspec/specs/agent-update/spec.md and moves fix-npm-ghost-probe-false-positive under openspec/changes/archive/.
  • Intake gate was satisfied on the implementation path; no new active change is required for archive delivery.

Validation

  • openspec:validate, memory:check, lint, format:check, and typecheck are appropriate for this surface.
  • Skipping local bun run test is reasonable here (archive-only, no src/ changes). CI still exercised the full matrix successfully.

PR body / closure

  • Template sections present; validate-body passed.
  • Release intent (docs: / OpenSpec archive only) is correct. Patch release already closed via #400 (0.25.5).
  • Closure state after merge: OpenSpec archive closure complete; no further archive follow-up for this change.

Non-blocking hygiene

  1. Validation checklist: either check Not run, explained below with a one-line reason (archive-only, behavior unchanged) or note that CI tests passed on the PR.
  2. Traceability: consider linking implementation PR #399 under Linked Artifacts for easier audit trail (same pattern as prior archive PRs).

CI

All required checks green (classify, lint, test matrix, sandbox-tests, validate-body). No triage action needed.

Reviewers

Maintainer-driven archive PR; no additional reviewer request from governance.

Open in Web View Automation 

Sent by Cursor Automation: Quantex CLI PR Governance

@Drswith Drswith merged commit 6fa631a into main Jul 1, 2026
11 checks passed
@Drswith Drswith deleted the codex/archive-fix-npm-ghost-probe-false-positive branch July 1, 2026 10:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant