Open
Conversation
Minimum allowed line rate is |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ overcommit (0.68.0 → 0.69.0) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
0.69.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 2 commits:
Cut version 0.69.0 (#877)Use Etc.nprocessors and handle sandboxed environments (#876)Release Notes
3.13.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 48 commits:
Merge pull request #994 from Dynamoid/ak/prepare-to-release-3-13-0Bump Dynamoid version to 3.13.0Update CHANGELONG.md and add new entriesMerge pull request #988 from Dynamoid/ak/upgrade-to-ruby-4-0Add Rails 8.1 in CIRun Ruby 4.0 on CIMerge pull request #987 from Dynamoid/ak/fix-primary-key-validation-in-transactional-methodsUpgrade Rubocop an fix warningsFix transactional #destroy and place primary key validation after running callbacksFix transactional #save and place primary key validation after running callbacksMerge pull request #973 from Dynamoid/pboling-patch-1Revise supported versions and vulnerability reportingMerge pull request #950 from Dynamoid/feat/upgrade-deps🚨 Linting🔨 binstub: rake⬆️ Upgrade deps within current allowed ranges📝 Tweaks to CONTRIBUTING.md🔨 binstub: rspec📌 Ruby 3.4.7 for developmentMerge pull request #947 from Dynamoid/ak/add-skip-generating-fields-table-method-optionAdd :skip_generating_fields option of the table() methodMerge pull request #945 from Dynamoid/ak/add-update-attribute-with-bangUpdate RDoc comments for #save!, #update_attributes! and create! to raise RecordNotSavedAdd missing specs for create, create! and #update_attributeAdd #update_attribute! methodMerge pull request #944 from Dynamoid/ak/fix-destroyed-edge-casesFix #delete and #destroy to set #destroyed? correctly when deleting failsAdd specs for #destroy() methodMerge pull request #943 from Dynamoid/ak/add-delete-class-methodImplement class method delete()Merge pull request #941 from Dynamoid/ak/allow-quering-with-gsi-and-table-arnImprove RDoc comment for the field methodClean up the persistence_spec.rb fileAdd :arn option for the table methodAdd RSpec matcher for DynamoDB requestsMerge pull request #935 from ckhsponge/ckh/rubocop-1.80Merge pull request #897 from ckhsponge/ckh/transaction-sanitize-itemRubocop 1.80In transaction writes, setting an attribute to nil should actually remove it RUBOCOPIn transaction writes, setting an attribute to nil should actually remove itIn transaction writes, setting an attribute to nil should actually remove it RUBOCOPIn transaction writes, setting an attribute to nil should actually remove itIn transaction writes, setting an attribute to nil should actually remove itIn transaction writes, setting an attribute to nil should actually remove it RUBOCOPIn transaction writes, setting an attribute to nil should actually remove ittransaction write indexes spec WIPTransactionWrite should call sanitize_item so that nils are not persisted. Rubocop.TransactionWrite should call sanitize_item so that nils are not persisted. Otherwise GSI will fail with a nil range key.Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands