|
1 | 1 | \Question{\currfilebase} |
2 | | -\WorkInProgress |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +\begin{enumerate} |
| 4 | + \item Using integration by parts, we notice that |
| 5 | + \begin{align*} |
| 6 | + (n + 1) I_n & = (n + 1) \int_{0}^{1} x^n \arctan x \Diff x \\ |
| 7 | + & = \int_{0}^{1} \arctan x \Diff x^{n + 1} \\ |
| 8 | + & = \left[\arctan x \cdot x^{n + 1}\right]_{0}^{1} - \int_{0}^{1} x^{n + 1} \Diff \arctan x \\ |
| 9 | + & = \arctan 1 \cdot 1^{n + 1} - \arctan 0 \cdot 0^{n + 1} - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^{n + 1}}{1 + x^2} \Diff x \\ |
| 10 | + & = \frac{\pi}{4} - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^{n + 1}}{1 + x^2} \Diff x. |
| 11 | + \end{align*} |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | + Set \(n = 0\), and we have |
| 14 | + \begin{align*} |
| 15 | + I_0 & = (0 + 1) I_0 \\ |
| 16 | + & = \frac{\pi}{4} - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x}{1 + x^2} \Diff x \\ |
| 17 | + & = \frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[\ln(1 + x^2)\right]_{0}^{1} \\ |
| 18 | + & = \frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[\ln 2 - \ln 1\right] \\ |
| 19 | + & = \frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{\ln 2}{2}. |
| 20 | + \end{align*} |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | + \item Using the result in the previous part, |
| 23 | + \begin{align*} |
| 24 | + (n + 3) I_{n + 2} + (n + 1) I_n & = \left(\frac{\pi}{4} - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^{n + 3}}{1 + x^2} \Diff x\right) + \left(\frac{\pi}{4} - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^{n + 1}}{1 + x^2} \Diff x\right) \\ |
| 25 | + & = \frac{\pi}{2} - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^{n + 1} + x^{n + 3}}{1 + x^2} \Diff x \\ |
| 26 | + & = \frac{\pi}{2} - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{x^{n + 1} \left(1 + x^2\right)}{1 + x^2} \Diff x \\ |
| 27 | + & = \frac{\pi}{2} - \int_{0}^{1} x^{n + 1} \Diff x \\ |
| 28 | + & = \frac{\pi}{2} - \frac{1}{n + 2} \left[x^{n + 2}\right]_{0}^{1} \\ |
| 29 | + & = \frac{\pi}{2} - \frac{1}{n + 2}. |
| 30 | + \end{align*} |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + Letting \(n = 0\), and we have |
| 33 | + \[ |
| 34 | + 3 I_2 + I_0 = \frac{\pi}{2} - \frac{1}{2}. |
| 35 | + \] |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | + Letting \(n = 2\), and we have |
| 39 | + \[ |
| 40 | + 5 I_4 + 3 I_2 = \frac{\pi}{2} - \frac{1}{4}. |
| 41 | + \] |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | + Subtracting the first one from the second one, and hence |
| 44 | + \[ |
| 45 | + 5 I_4 - I_0 = \frac{1}{4}. |
| 46 | + \] |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | + Hence, |
| 49 | + \[ |
| 50 | + I_4 = \frac{1}{5} \cdot \left[\frac{1}{4} + \left(\frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{\ln 2}{2}\right)\right] = \frac{1}{20} + \frac{\pi}{20} - \frac{\ln 2}{10}. |
| 51 | + \] |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | + \item Let \(n = 1\), and the statement says |
| 54 | + \begin{align*} |
| 55 | + (4n + 1) I_{4n} & = 5 I_4 \\ |
| 56 | + & = A - \frac{1}{2} \sum_{r = 1}^{2 \cdot 1}(-1)^r \frac{1}{r} \\ |
| 57 | + & = A - \frac{1}{2} \left(- \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{2}\right) \\ |
| 58 | + & = A + \frac{1}{4}. |
| 59 | + \end{align*} |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | + Comparing to the previous expression, we claim that |
| 62 | + \[ |
| 63 | + A = \frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{\ln 2}{2}. |
| 64 | + \] |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | + This shows the base case for \(n = 1\). For the induction step, we first introduce a lemma. Since |
| 67 | + \[ |
| 68 | + (n + 5) I_{n + 4} + (n + 3) I_{n + 2} = \frac{\pi}{2} - \frac{1}{n + 4}, (n + 3) I_{n + 2} + (n + 1) I_{n} = \frac{\pi}{2} - \frac{1}{n + 2}, |
| 69 | + \] |
| 70 | + subtracting the second one from the first one will give us |
| 71 | + \[ |
| 72 | + (n + 5) I_{n + 4} - (n + 1) I_{n} = \frac{1}{n + 2} - \frac{1}{n + 4}. |
| 73 | + \] |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | + Setting \(n = 4m\), we have |
| 76 | + \begin{align*} |
| 77 | + (4(m + 1) + 1) I_{4 (m + 1)} & = (4m + 1) I_{4m} + \frac{1}{4m + 2} - \frac{1}{4m + 4} \\ |
| 78 | + & = (4m + 1) I_{4m} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left(-\frac{1}{2m + 1} + \frac{1}{2m + 2}\right) \\ |
| 79 | + & = (4m + 1) I_{4m} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[(-1)^{2m + 1} \frac{1}{2m + 1} + (-1)^{2m + 2} \frac{1}{2m + 2}\right]. |
| 80 | + \end{align*} |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | + Now we show the inductive step. Assume the statement is true for some \(n = k \geq 1\), i.e. |
| 83 | + \[ |
| 84 | + (4k + 1) I_{4k} = A - \frac{1}{2} \sum_{r = 1}^{2n} (-1)^r \frac{1}{r}. |
| 85 | + \] |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | + Using the identity above, we have |
| 88 | + \begin{align*} |
| 89 | + (4(k + 1) + 1) I_{4 (k + 1)} & = (4k + 1) I_{4k} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[(-1)^{2k + 1} \frac{1}{2k + 1} + (-1)^{2k + 2} \frac{1}{2k + 2}\right] \\ |
| 90 | + & = A - \frac{1}{2} \sum_{r = 1}^{2k} (-1)^r \frac{1}{r} - \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left[(-1)^{2k + 1} \frac{1}{2k + 1} + (-1)^{2k + 2} \frac{1}{2k + 2}\right] \\ |
| 91 | + & = A - \frac{1}{2} \sum_{r = 1}^{2(k + 1)} (-1)^r \frac{1}{r}. |
| 92 | + \end{align*} |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | + Hence, the original statement is true for \(n = 1\) (as shown when determining the value of \(A\)), and given the original statement holds for some \(n = k \geq 1\), it holds for \(n = k + 1\). By the principle of mathematical induction, this statement holds for all \(n \geq 1\), where |
| 95 | + \[ |
| 96 | + A = \frac{\pi}{4} - \frac{\ln 2}{2}. |
| 97 | + \] |
| 98 | +\end{enumerate} |
0 commit comments