Skip to content

Audit all skill instructions for Astra and Fable - #43

Open
ElliotDrel wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
audit/astra-fable-prompts
Open

Audit all skill instructions for Astra and Fable#43
ElliotDrel wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
audit/astra-fable-prompts

Conversation

@ElliotDrel

@ElliotDrel ElliotDrel commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

A complete request could still stall on mandatory intake, repeated confirmation, or a conflicting instruction hidden in a nested skill file. This audits all 24 skills and the shared authoring guidance against the current GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 guidance.

The final behavior keeps every skill because each still carries distinct domain knowledge, tooling, or a useful deliverable. It removes compulsory setup and approval loops, narrows overlapping triggers, keeps authorized work moving, preserves source-grounded coaching, and fixes command, path, credential, cache, backup, and external-action boundaries. The shared templates and release docs now agree with those rules and retain the concrete runbook details needed to publish safely.

A Fable 5.1 review covered the full 87-file audit, then a second focused Fable pass checked the corrections. The accepted findings fixed cross-file contradictions in Flight Planner, Customer Discovery, Leadership Coach, Notify, PDF to Markdown, Doc Review Viewer, generated-skill paths, coaching templates, and the release workflow. The audit report records the retention rationale, scope, and limitations.

Validation: all repository version, feedback, inventory, name, path, and diff checks pass; 57 local Markdown links resolve; pytest passes 195 tests with 1 skip; migration validation passes 27/27 cases; and the Node migration-note smoke test passes. The documented GitHub branch protection, merge, Actions-permission, Dependabot, and secret-scanning baseline was also verified through read-only API calls.

No live skill installation or npm release was performed.

Revise all 24 skills and their active supporting flows around the requested outcome. Remove redundant intake and approval loops, preserve domain methods and evidence, and keep external actions within the authorized scope.

Correct CLI examples, installed paths, credential setup, repository-cache preservation, and migration recovery guidance. Simplify the two meta skills, align authoring templates and release docs, and record retention decisions and verification in the audit report.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 2a3385c7-2920-48a2-9a64-c9bfaffc5bcb


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-08T02:54:46.706543Z b01407b PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b01407b2c1

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread skills/estack-notify/SKILL.md Outdated
Comment thread skills/estack-flight-planner/SKILL.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant