Add comprehensive code review for market data backend - #5
Merged
Conversation
Reviews backend/app/market/ against planning/PLAN.md section 6, confirms the session-baseline feature (open_price, change_from_open_percent) is fully implemented, and documents findings around Massive add_ticker price-seeding latency, ticker normalization inconsistency between the two MarketDataSource implementations, and stale documentation. Co-authored-by: Essam Hasin <123895080+EnigmaticFuel@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds
planning/MARKET_DATA_REVIEW.md, a comprehensive code review ofbackend/app/market/againstplanning/PLAN.mdsection 6.MassiveDataSource.add_tickerdoesn't seed a live price synchronously, which will interact badly with the planned 2swait_for_pricetimeout on tradesMarketDataSourceimplementationsbackend/CLAUDE.mdandplanning/MARKET_DATA_SUMMARY.md#4
Note: the test suite could not be executed in this sandboxed, unattended CI run (uv/pip/python invocations require interactive approval not available here); the review is based on a full static read of all test modules plus the author's confirmation that tests pass.
Generated with Claude Code