Skip to content

[18.0][ADD] tier_validation_dynamic_state: add new module#5

Open
WesleyOliveira98 wants to merge 1 commit into18.0from
18.0-add-tier_validation_dynamic_state
Open

[18.0][ADD] tier_validation_dynamic_state: add new module#5
WesleyOliveira98 wants to merge 1 commit into18.0from
18.0-add-tier_validation_dynamic_state

Conversation

@WesleyOliveira98
Copy link

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 82.83%. Comparing base (076dfd7) to head (06c65e2).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...validation_dynamic_state/models/tier_validation.py 81.39% 9 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             18.0       #5       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   58.90%   82.83%   +23.92%     
===========================================
  Files           6       13        +7     
  Lines          73      233      +160     
  Branches        4       22       +18     
===========================================
+ Hits           43      193      +150     
- Misses         28       30        +2     
- Partials        2       10        +8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@marcelsavegnago
Copy link
Contributor

@WesleyOliveira98 aumenta a cobertura de teste por favor.

@WesleyOliveira98 WesleyOliveira98 force-pushed the 18.0-add-tier_validation_dynamic_state branch 6 times, most recently from 0b7b1a1 to 6e7a3ac Compare February 11, 2026 10:50
@WesleyOliveira98 WesleyOliveira98 force-pushed the 18.0-add-tier_validation_dynamic_state branch from 6e7a3ac to 06c65e2 Compare February 11, 2026 10:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants