Skip to content

fix(container): update image ghcr.io/joryirving/paseo (f90db21 ➔ 9f347d1) - #1762

Open
faust-renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/ghcr.io-joryirving-paseo-0.12.0
Open

faust-renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/ghcr.io-joryirving-paseo-0.12.0

Conversation

@faust-renovate

@faust-renovate faust-renovate Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
ghcr.io/joryirving/paseo (source) digest f90db21 → 9f347d1

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate CLI.

@faust-renovate

faust-renovate Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

konflate · #1762 — fix(container): update image ghcr.io/joryirving/paseo (f90db21 ➔ 9f347d1)

Tip

Routine: only container-image and chart-version changes; 2 resources across 2 apps

image from to upstream
ghcr.io/joryirving/paseo 0.12.0@sha256:f90db2… 0.12.0@sha256:9f347d… ✅

konflate 0.6.6 · rendered 0c8073f

@faust-review

faust-review Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Confidence Score: 5/5

[Low risk] The risk remains low because this is a same-version digest replacement for a single application, with the rendered changes confined to its image reference and no indication of central dependency impact or irreversible effects.

Approved

Summary

Moves the paseo image digest while keeping the 0.12.0 tag pinned

The PR replaces one digest of ghcr.io/joryirving/paseo with another under the unchanged 0.12.0 tag, and konflate's render shows that is the whole cluster effect: the pod template of Deployment ai/paseo changes, so the reloader-annotated Deployment recreates the pod when Flux applies it. Because the tag itself does not move, there is no release-note range between the two versions to read: upstream getpaseo/paseo still publishes v0.12.0 as its newest stable release, and the two digests are rebuilds of that same version, so nothing in the changelog applies that was not already in place. The open question the lines raise is why ghcr.io/joryirving/paseo:0.12.0 has been retagged at all: across this PR's revisions Renovate has proposed three different digests (f90db21, a909464, now 9f347d1) for one tag, so the fork's 0.12.0 tag is not immutable upstream and each merge pulls in whatever that rebuild carries, which no notes here describe. Merging is a normal pod restart with no data or config change; the persistence mounts and the projected paseo-config are untouched.

Review context · 1 source · 2/7 commands

Reviews (2) · Last reviewed commit: "fix(container): update image ghcr.io/jor..." · self-qwen3.8-flash-next/low

@faust-review faust-review Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

kritika: confidence 5/5 with low risk at a08ed88.

@faust-renovate faust-renovate Bot changed the title fix(container): update image ghcr.io/joryirving/paseo (f90db21 ➔ a909464) fix(container): update image ghcr.io/joryirving/paseo (f90db21 ➔ 9f347d1) Oct 24, 2026
@faust-renovate
faust-renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/ghcr.io-joryirving-paseo-0.12.0 branch from a08ed88 to 0c8073f Compare October 24, 2026 03:01

@faust-review faust-review Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

kritika: confidence 5/5 with low risk at 0c8073f.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants