chore/translate-new-notes - #19
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 51 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (65)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request expands and localizes the Russian LeetCode collection. It adds new problem pages, updates existing explanations and examples, adds section indexes, changes navigation paths and labels, and refreshes translation manifest hashes. ChangesRussian LeetCode content
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
CI's `npm run check` (prettier --check) was failing on PR #19 for 64 new Russian-language leetcode notes. Reformatted with prettier --write.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Note
Due to the large number of review comments, Critical, Major severity comments were prioritized as inline comments.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2631-group-by.md (1)
20-29: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick winHandle prototype keys safely in
groupBy.
fnmay return any string, butkey in resultalso matches inherited properties. Inputs producing keys such asconstructor,toString, or__proto__can throw or behave incorrectly.Suggested fix
- const result: Record<string, T[]> = {} + const result = Object.create(null) as Record<string, T[]>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2631-group-by.md` around lines 20 - 29, Update the grouping logic in groupBy so keys returned by fn are checked only against result’s own properties, preventing inherited prototype keys such as constructor, toString, and __proto__ from being treated as existing groups. Preserve the current append-or-create behavior for all keys.content-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/125-valid-palindrome.md (1)
54-54: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winNormalize the
Two Pointersnavigation paths.The changed links use
Two-Pointers, but the supplied directory is namedTwo Pointers, so these related-page links may not resolve.
content-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/125-valid-palindrome.md#L54-L54: changeleetcode/Two-Pointers/151-reverse-words-in-a-stringtoleetcode/Two Pointers/151-reverse-words-in-a-string.content-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/151-reverse-words-in-a-string.md#L45-L46: change bothTwo-Pointerstargets toTwo Pointers.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Two` Pointers/125-valid-palindrome.md at line 54, Normalize the related-page navigation paths by replacing the Two-Pointers directory segment with Two Pointers in content-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/125-valid-palindrome.md lines 54-54 and both targets in content-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/151-reverse-words-in-a-string.md lines 45-46.
🟡 Minor comments (15)
content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md-10-35 (1)
10-35: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winResolve the Prettier failures before merging.
content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md#L10-L35: run Prettier on the Markdown and fenced TypeScript.content-ru/leetcode/Array/128-longest-consecutive-sequence.md#L7-L49: run Prettier on the Markdown and fenced TypeScript.content-ru/leetcode/Array/15-3sum.md#L8-L56: run Prettier on the Markdown and fenced TypeScript.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md` around lines 10 - 35, Resolve the Prettier formatting failures in content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md lines 10-35, content-ru/leetcode/Array/128-longest-consecutive-sequence.md lines 7-49, and content-ru/leetcode/Array/15-3sum.md lines 8-56 by running Prettier over each Markdown file and its fenced TypeScript blocks; preserve the existing examples and behavior.Source: Pipeline failures
content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md-8-8 (1)
8-8: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winSplit the concatenated constraint lists into separate items.
content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md#L8-L8: restoren == height.length,2 <= n <= 10^5, and0 <= height[i] <= 10^4.content-ru/leetcode/Array/1431-kids-with-the-greatest-number-of-candies.md#L7-L7: separate then,candies[i], andextraCandiesbounds.content-ru/leetcode/Array/1441-build-an-array-with-stack-operations.md#L13-L13: separate each target and stream constraint.content-ru/leetcode/Array/1470-shuffle-the-array.md#L5-L5: separate then, array-length, and value bounds.content-ru/leetcode/Array/15-3sum.md#L6-L6: separate the array-length and value bounds.content-ru/leetcode/Array/217-contains-duplicate.md#L4-L4: separate the array-length and value bounds.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md` at line 8, Separate the concatenated constraint lists into distinct Markdown list items. Update content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md lines 8-8 to restore n == height.length, 2 <= n <= 10^5, and 0 <= height[i] <= 10^4; apply the same separation to the n, candies[i], and extraCandies bounds in content-ru/leetcode/Array/1431-kids-with-the-greatest-number-of-candies.md lines 7-7, each target and stream constraint in content-ru/leetcode/Array/1441-build-an-array-with-stack-operations.md lines 13-13, the n, array-length, and value bounds in content-ru/leetcode/Array/1470-shuffle-the-array.md lines 5-5, and the array-length and value bounds in content-ru/leetcode/Array/15-3sum.md lines 6-6 and content-ru/leetcode/Array/217-contains-duplicate.md lines 4-4.content-ru/leetcode/Array/1431-kids-with-the-greatest-number-of-candies.md-53-53 (1)
53-53: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winKeep navigation metadata outside fenced examples and use the canonical leetcode path casing.
- Move the affected
<!-- [[leetcode/array]] ... -->comments into the surrounding non-fenced content of both files and changeleetcode/arraytoleetcode/Array.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/1431-kids-with-the-greatest-number-of-candies.md` at line 53, In content-ru/leetcode/Array/1431-kids-with-the-greatest-number-of-candies.md at line 53 and content-ru/leetcode/Array/1475-final-prices-with-a-special-discount-in-a-shop.md at line 50, move the navigation metadata comments outside fenced code examples into surrounding non-fenced content, and change every leetcode/array reference to leetcode/Array.content-ru/leetcode/Array/36-valid-sudoku.md-12-12 (1)
12-12: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winFormat
board[i][j]as code.Markdown interprets the bracket notation as a reference-style link and reports an undefined
jreference. Wrap the expression in backticks (and similarly format the constraint expressions) to preserve the intended text.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/36-valid-sudoku.md` at line 12, Format the constraint expressions in the “Ограничения” line as inline code, especially board[i][j], so Markdown does not interpret the bracket notation as a link reference; apply the same formatting consistently to board.length, board[i].length, and the value expression.Source: Linters/SAST tools
content-ru/leetcode/Array/283-move-zeroes.md-26-30 (1)
26-30: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winLog the mutated arrays in the local checks.
moveZeroesreturnsvoid, soconsole.log(moveZeroes(...))printsundefinedinstead of the transformed array.Proposed fix
-console.log(moveZeroes([0, 1, 0, 3, 12])); -console.log(moveZeroes([0])); -console.log(moveZeroes([0, 1, 2, 3, 0])); +const nums1 = [0, 1, 0, 3, 12]; +moveZeroes(nums1); +console.log(nums1); + +const nums2 = [0]; +moveZeroes(nums2); +console.log(nums2); + +const nums3 = [0, 1, 2, 3, 0]; +moveZeroes(nums3); +console.log(nums3);🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/283-move-zeroes.md` around lines 26 - 30, Update the local checks for moveZeroes to log each input array after the function mutates it, rather than logging the void return value. Preserve the existing test cases and ensure the transformed arrays are the values passed to console.log.content-ru/leetcode/Linked List/206-reverse-linked-list.md-44-44 (1)
44-44: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winCorrect the local-check output comment.
reverseList(null)returnsnull, not[]; update the comment to// nullor change the check to serialize the result as an empty list.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Linked` List/206-reverse-linked-list.md at line 44, Update the local-check annotation for reverseList(null) to reflect the function’s actual null return value by changing the comment to // null; do not alter reverseList behavior.content-ru/leetcode/Linked List/206-reverse-linked-list.md-3-7 (1)
3-7: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winKeep this page localized in Russian.
This
content-rupage replaces its problem statement and examples with English text, which regresses the Russian localization delivered by this PR. Translate the changed prose consistently with the surrounding Russian pages.Also applies to: 47-61
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Linked` List/206-reverse-linked-list.md around lines 3 - 7, Translate the changed problem statement, constraints, follow-up, and examples in the localized Linked List page back into Russian, matching the terminology and style of surrounding Russian pages while preserving the problem’s meaning and structure.content-ru/leetcode/Array/496-next-greater-element-i.md-60-60 (1)
60-60: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winFix the repeated Markdown heading syntax.
Each
#leetcodefooter should be changed to# leetcodeto satisfy markdownlint MD018.
content-ru/leetcode/Array/496-next-greater-element-i.md#L60-L60: add the missing space after#.content-ru/leetcode/Array/704-binary-search.md#L49-L49: add the missing space after#.content-ru/leetcode/Array/735-asteroid-collision.md#L86-L86: add the missing space after#.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/496-next-greater-element-i.md` at line 60, Update the repeated Markdown footer heading from “#leetcode” to “# leetcode” in content-ru/leetcode/Array/496-next-greater-element-i.md:60-60, content-ru/leetcode/Array/704-binary-search.md:49-49, and content-ru/leetcode/Array/735-asteroid-collision.md:86-86.Source: Linters/SAST tools
content-ru/leetcode/index.md-10-15 (1)
10-15: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winСохраните доступность категории Bit Manipulation.
Этот индекс удаляет категорию
Bit Manipulation, ноcontent-ru/leetcode/Math/67-add-binary.mdпо-прежнему ссылается наleetcode/Bit Manipulation/index. Оставьте категорию в корневом списке либо обновите ссылку на существующий индекс.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/index.md` around lines 10 - 15, Restore the Bit Manipulation category in the root leetcode index, or update the reference in Math/67-add-binary.md to point to an existing index; preserve a valid navigable link for that category.content-ru/leetcode/Array/853-car-fleet.md-4-4 (1)
4-4: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winИсправьте согласование в описании массивов.
positionиspeed— два массива, поэтому здесь должно бытьобе длиной n, а необа длиной n.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/853-car-fleet.md` at line 4, В описании задачи исправьте согласование для массивов position и speed: замените «оба длиной n» на «обе длиной n», не изменяя остальной текст.Source: Linters/SAST tools
content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2726-calculator-with-method-chaining.md-15-15 (1)
15-15: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winРазделите ограничения на отдельные пункты.
Сейчас строка смешивает арифметические
*и разделители-, из-за чего ограничения плохо читаются и срабатывает markdownlint MD037. Используйте отдельные blockquote-строки и×либо code spans для умножения.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2726-calculator-with-method-chaining.md` at line 15, Разделите ограничения в описании задачи на отдельные строки blockquote: каждое условие должно быть самостоятельным пунктом. Замените арифметические символы `*` на `×` или оформите их через code spans, сохранив все исходные условия и значения.Source: Linters/SAST tools
content-ru/leetcode/Stack/155-min-stack.md-13-50 (1)
13-50: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winFix the failing Prettier check before merge.
The pipeline reports that Prettier fails for this file. Run Prettier on the Markdown file and commit the formatted result.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Stack/155-min-stack.md` around lines 13 - 50, Run Prettier on the Markdown file containing the MinStack example and apply its formatting to the code block and surrounding content. Preserve the implementation and examples unchanged apart from formatting, then commit the resulting formatted file.Source: Pipeline failures
content-ru/leetcode/String/20-valid-parentheses.md-12-23 (1)
12-23: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winFix the failing Prettier check before merge.
The pipeline reports that Prettier fails for this file. Run Prettier on the Markdown file and commit the formatted result.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/String/20-valid-parentheses.md` around lines 12 - 23, Run Prettier against the Markdown file containing isValid and the local console.log checks, then commit the formatter’s output without changing the example’s behavior.Source: Pipeline failures
content-ru/leetcode/Tree/104-maximum-depth-of-binary-tree.md-52-52 (1)
52-52: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winFix the Tree index link.
This page links to
leetcode/Binary-Tree/index, but the corresponding Russian index isleetcode/Tree/index. The current link will not navigate to the supplied category page.Proposed fix
-[[leetcode/Binary-Tree/index]] +[[leetcode/Tree/index]]🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Tree/104-maximum-depth-of-binary-tree.md` at line 52, Update the index link in the maximum-depth-of-binary-tree page from leetcode/Binary-Tree/index to the correct Russian category path leetcode/Tree/index.content-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/index.md-9-14 (1)
9-14: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winUpdate remaining backlinks after the path migration.
The index now uses
Two Pointers/..., butcontent-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/345-reverse-vowels-of-a-string.mdstill links toTwo-Pointers/1768-merge-strings-alternately, which no longer matches the renamed directory. Search and update remainingTwo-Pointers/references consistently.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Two` Pointers/index.md around lines 9 - 14, Search the content-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers subtree for remaining `Two-Pointers/` backlinks and update them to the renamed `Two Pointers/` path, including the link in `345-reverse-vowels-of-a-string.md`; preserve each existing target and link formatting.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2703-return-length-of-arguments-passed.md (1)
10-15: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winSimplify the unreachable fallback.
Because
argsis always an array when created by a rest parameter,Array.isArray(args)is always true. Returningargs.lengthdirectly makes the implementation clearer.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2703-return-length-of-arguments-passed.md` around lines 10 - 15, In argumentsLength, remove the redundant Array.isArray(args) condition and unreachable fallback, returning args.length directly for the rest-parameter array.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/128-longest-consecutive-sequence.md`:
- Around line 12-16: Update the loop in the longest-consecutive-sequence
solution to iterate over unique values rather than every entry in nums, while
retaining the predecessor check and sequence scan. Use the existing set st to
skip duplicate values before processing, ensuring repeated smallest values
cannot trigger repeated full scans and the algorithm remains O(n).
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/1441-build-an-array-with-stack-operations.md`:
- Around line 8-10: Update the stack-operation rules in the problem statement so
the Pop operation occurs only when the streamed integer is not contained in
target, rather than whenever the stack is non-empty. Preserve the existing Push
rule and the stopping condition once the stack matches target.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Stack/155-min-stack.md`:
- Around line 32-38: Update top() and getMin() to apply the existing non-null
assertion pattern to stack.at(-1) and minStack.at(-1), respectively, so both
methods satisfy their declared number return types while preserving the current
access behavior.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/String/20-valid-parentheses.md`:
- Around line 13-15: Implement the empty isValid function to evaluate whether
the input string contains properly matched and nested parentheses, brackets, and
braces, returning a boolean for every input. Use a stack-based approach that
matches each closing delimiter with its corresponding opener and rejects
mismatches or leftover openers.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Tree/104-maximum-depth-of-binary-tree.md`:
- Around line 1-53: Run the repository’s Prettier formatter on the markdown file
containing the TreeNode class and maxDepth function, then apply and commit only
the formatter-generated changes so the Prettier check passes.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2693-call-function-with-custom-context.md`:
- Around line 20-25: Update the wrapper logic around the context object to use
the supplied context directly instead of creating a spread copy, preserving its
identity, prototype chain, and non-enumerable properties. Assign the temporary
symbol property to that original context, invoke the function through it, and
remove the temporary property afterward while preserving the existing argument
forwarding behavior.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Two` Pointers/125-valid-palindrome.md:
- Line 54: Normalize the related-page navigation paths by replacing the
Two-Pointers directory segment with Two Pointers in content-ru/leetcode/Two
Pointers/125-valid-palindrome.md lines 54-54 and both targets in
content-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/151-reverse-words-in-a-string.md lines 45-46.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2631-group-by.md`:
- Around line 20-29: Update the grouping logic in groupBy so keys returned by fn
are checked only against result’s own properties, preventing inherited prototype
keys such as constructor, toString, and __proto__ from being treated as existing
groups. Preserve the current append-or-create behavior for all keys.
---
Minor comments:
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md`:
- Around line 10-35: Resolve the Prettier formatting failures in
content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md lines 10-35,
content-ru/leetcode/Array/128-longest-consecutive-sequence.md lines 7-49, and
content-ru/leetcode/Array/15-3sum.md lines 8-56 by running Prettier over each
Markdown file and its fenced TypeScript blocks; preserve the existing examples
and behavior.
- Line 8: Separate the concatenated constraint lists into distinct Markdown list
items. Update content-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.md lines
8-8 to restore n == height.length, 2 <= n <= 10^5, and 0 <= height[i] <= 10^4;
apply the same separation to the n, candies[i], and extraCandies bounds in
content-ru/leetcode/Array/1431-kids-with-the-greatest-number-of-candies.md lines
7-7, each target and stream constraint in
content-ru/leetcode/Array/1441-build-an-array-with-stack-operations.md lines
13-13, the n, array-length, and value bounds in
content-ru/leetcode/Array/1470-shuffle-the-array.md lines 5-5, and the
array-length and value bounds in content-ru/leetcode/Array/15-3sum.md lines 6-6
and content-ru/leetcode/Array/217-contains-duplicate.md lines 4-4.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/1431-kids-with-the-greatest-number-of-candies.md`:
- Line 53: In
content-ru/leetcode/Array/1431-kids-with-the-greatest-number-of-candies.md at
line 53 and
content-ru/leetcode/Array/1475-final-prices-with-a-special-discount-in-a-shop.md
at line 50, move the navigation metadata comments outside fenced code examples
into surrounding non-fenced content, and change every leetcode/array reference
to leetcode/Array.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/283-move-zeroes.md`:
- Around line 26-30: Update the local checks for moveZeroes to log each input
array after the function mutates it, rather than logging the void return value.
Preserve the existing test cases and ensure the transformed arrays are the
values passed to console.log.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/36-valid-sudoku.md`:
- Line 12: Format the constraint expressions in the “Ограничения” line as inline
code, especially board[i][j], so Markdown does not interpret the bracket
notation as a link reference; apply the same formatting consistently to
board.length, board[i].length, and the value expression.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/496-next-greater-element-i.md`:
- Line 60: Update the repeated Markdown footer heading from “#leetcode” to “#
leetcode” in content-ru/leetcode/Array/496-next-greater-element-i.md:60-60,
content-ru/leetcode/Array/704-binary-search.md:49-49, and
content-ru/leetcode/Array/735-asteroid-collision.md:86-86.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/853-car-fleet.md`:
- Line 4: В описании задачи исправьте согласование для массивов position и
speed: замените «оба длиной n» на «обе длиной n», не изменяя остальной текст.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/index.md`:
- Around line 10-15: Restore the Bit Manipulation category in the root leetcode
index, or update the reference in Math/67-add-binary.md to point to an existing
index; preserve a valid navigable link for that category.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Linked` List/206-reverse-linked-list.md:
- Line 44: Update the local-check annotation for reverseList(null) to reflect
the function’s actual null return value by changing the comment to // null; do
not alter reverseList behavior.
- Around line 3-7: Translate the changed problem statement, constraints,
follow-up, and examples in the localized Linked List page back into Russian,
matching the terminology and style of surrounding Russian pages while preserving
the problem’s meaning and structure.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Stack/155-min-stack.md`:
- Around line 13-50: Run Prettier on the Markdown file containing the MinStack
example and apply its formatting to the code block and surrounding content.
Preserve the implementation and examples unchanged apart from formatting, then
commit the resulting formatted file.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/String/20-valid-parentheses.md`:
- Around line 12-23: Run Prettier against the Markdown file containing isValid
and the local console.log checks, then commit the formatter’s output without
changing the example’s behavior.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Tree/104-maximum-depth-of-binary-tree.md`:
- Line 52: Update the index link in the maximum-depth-of-binary-tree page from
leetcode/Binary-Tree/index to the correct Russian category path
leetcode/Tree/index.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Two` Pointers/index.md:
- Around line 9-14: Search the content-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers subtree for
remaining `Two-Pointers/` backlinks and update them to the renamed `Two
Pointers/` path, including the link in `345-reverse-vowels-of-a-string.md`;
preserve each existing target and link formatting.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2726-calculator-with-method-chaining.md`:
- Line 15: Разделите ограничения в описании задачи на отдельные строки
blockquote: каждое условие должно быть самостоятельным пунктом. Замените
арифметические символы `*` на `×` или оформите их через code spans, сохранив все
исходные условия и значения.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2703-return-length-of-arguments-passed.md`:
- Around line 10-15: In argumentsLength, remove the redundant
Array.isArray(args) condition and unreachable fallback, returning args.length
directly for the rest-parameter array.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: ad8171eb-9c24-4b31-9112-120e1d657dbd
📒 Files selected for processing (75)
content-ru/.translation-manifest.jsoncontent-ru/leetcode/Array/11-container-with-most-water.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/128-longest-consecutive-sequence.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/1365-how-many-numbers-are-smaller-than-the-current-number.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/1431-kids-with-the-greatest-number-of-candies.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/1441-build-an-array-with-stack-operations.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/1470-shuffle-the-array.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/1475-final-prices-with-a-special-discount-in-a-shop.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/15-3sum.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/150-evaluate-reverse-polish-notation.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/217-contains-duplicate.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/238-product-of-array-except-self.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/268-missing-number.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/283-move-zeroes.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/347-top-k-frequent-elements.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/36-valid-sudoku.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/448-find-all-numbers-disappeared-in-an-array.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/485-max-consecutive-ones.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/49-group-anagrams.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/496-next-greater-element-i.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/605-can-place-flowers.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/636-exclusive-time-of-functions.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/643-maximum-average-subarray-i.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/645-set-mismatch.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/704-binary-search.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/735-asteroid-collision.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/739-daily-temperatures.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/853-car-fleet.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/977-squares-of-a-sorted-array.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Array/index.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Hash Table/141-linked-list-cycle.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Hash Table/242-valid-anagram.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Hash Table/index.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Linked List/206-reverse-linked-list.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Linked List/876-middle-of-the-linked-list.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Linked List/index.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Math/1071-greatest-common-divisor-of-strings.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Math/67-add-binary.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Math/index.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Stack/155-min-stack.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Stack/index.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/String/20-valid-parentheses.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/String/index.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Tree/104-maximum-depth-of-binary-tree.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Tree/index.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/125-valid-palindrome.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/151-reverse-words-in-a-string.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/1768-merge-strings-alternately.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/345-reverse-vowels-of-a-string.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/392-is-subsequence.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/844-backspace-string-compare.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Two Pointers/index.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/125-valid-palindrome-neetcode.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2620-counter.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2622-cache-with-time-limit.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2623-memoize.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2626-array-reduce-transformation.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2627-debounce.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2629-function-composition.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2631-group-by.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2637-promise-time-limit.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2665-counter2.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2666-allow-one-fn-call.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2677-chunk-array.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2693-call-function-with-custom-context.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2703-return-length-of-arguments-passed.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/271-string-encode-and-decode.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2715-timeout-cancellation.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2721-execute-asynchronous-functions-in-parallel.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2723-add-two-promises.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2724-sort-by.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2725-interval-cancellation.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2726-calculator-with-method-chaining.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/Untagged/index.mdcontent-ru/leetcode/index.md
| for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) { | ||
| if (st.has(nums[i] - 1)) continue | ||
| for (let j = 1; j < nums.length + 1; j++) { | ||
| // является ли число началом последовательности? | ||
| if (st.has(nums[i] + j)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚀 Performance & Scalability | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Iterate over unique values to preserve O(n).
Duplicate copies of the smallest value pass the predecessor check and each rescan the entire sequence. For example, many 1s followed by 2..50001 can make this quadratic and violate the problem’s required complexity.
Proposed fix
- for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
- if (st.has(nums[i] - 1)) continue
+ for (const num of st) {
+ if (st.has(num - 1)) continue
for (let j = 1; j < nums.length + 1; j++) {
- if (st.has(nums[i] + j)) {
+ if (st.has(num + j)) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| for (let i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) { | |
| if (st.has(nums[i] - 1)) continue | |
| for (let j = 1; j < nums.length + 1; j++) { | |
| // является ли число началом последовательности? | |
| if (st.has(nums[i] + j)) { | |
| for (const num of st) { | |
| if (st.has(num - 1)) continue | |
| for (let j = 1; j < nums.length + 1; j++) { | |
| // является ли число началом последовательности? | |
| if (st.has(num + j)) { |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Array/128-longest-consecutive-sequence.md` around lines
12 - 16, Update the loop in the longest-consecutive-sequence solution to iterate
over unique values rather than every entry in nums, while retaining the
predecessor check and sequence scan. Use the existing set st to skip duplicate
values before processing, ensuring repeated smallest values cannot trigger
repeated full scans and the algorithm remains O(n).
| top(): number { | ||
| return this.stack.at(-1); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| getMin(): number { | ||
| return this.minStack.at(-1); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "Repository files matching target:"
fd -a '155-min-stack\.md$' . || true
echo
echo "Target excerpt:"
file=$(fd '155-min-stack\.md$' . | head -n 1 || true)
if [ -n "${file:-}" ]; then
wc -l "$file"
sed -n '1,80p' "$file" | nl -ba
fi
echo
echo "Search for tsconfig/strict null checks hints:"
fd -a 'tsconfig.*\.json$|package.json$' . | head -n 50 | while read -r f; do
echo "--- $f"
sed -n '1,160p' "$f" | grep -nE '(strictNullChecks|strict|typeAcquisition|compilerOptions|typescript)' || true
done
echo
echo "Search same Stack solution patterns:"
rg -n "top\(\)[^}]*at\(-1\)|getMin\(\)[^}]*at\(-1\)" . || true
echo
echo "Read-only JS/TS type probe using declared lib semantics if available:"
node - <<'JS'
function f() {
// Mirrors TypeScript lib.dom.d.ts / lib.es2022.array.d.ts signature for Array.prototype.at
// (TS5+): at(index: number): T | undefined.
// In runtime JS, at(-1) on non-empty array returns value; nullability is a type-system concern.
console.log('runtime example:', [1,2].at(-1), [1,2].at(0));
}
f();
JSRepository: Faustze/notes
Length of output: 409
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
file="./content-ru/leetcode/Stack/155-min-stack.md"
echo "Line count:"
wc -l "$file"
echo
echo "Target excerpt with line numbers:"
awk '{printf "%4d %s\n", NR, $0}' "$file" | sed -n '1,90p'
echo
echo "Candidate repo files:"
printf '%s\n' ./content-ru/leetcode/Stack/155-min-stack.md ./content/leetcode/Stack/155-min-stack.md
echo
echo "Search for tsconfig/package.json and relevant compiler options:"
fd -a 'tsconfig.*\.json$|package.json$' . 2>/dev/null | while read -r f; do
echo "--- $f"
grep -nE '(strictNullChecks|strict|typeAcquisition|compilerOptions|typescript|noEmit|ts-node)' "$f" || true
done
echo
echo "Search same top/getMin stack.at(-1) pattern:"
rg -n "top\(\)[^}]*at\(-1\)|getMin\(\)[^}]*at\(-1\)" . || true
echo
echo "Type check probe with local TypeScript if available:"
if command -v tsc >/dev/null 2>&1; then
tmpdir=$(mktemp -d)
cat > "$tmpdir/probe.ts" <<'TS'
class MinStack {
private stack: number[] = [];
private minStack: number[] = [];
top(): number {
return this.stack.at(-1);
}
getMin(): number {
return this.minStack.at(-1);
}
}
TS
tsc --noEmit --strictNullChecks "$tmpdir/probe.ts" || true
else
echo "tsc not available"
fiRepository: Faustze/notes
Length of output: 2915
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "tsconfig.json:"
cat -n tsconfig.json
echo
echo "Type check probe with local TypeScript, ignoring repo tsconfig:"
tmpdir=$(mktemp -d)
cat > "$tmpdir/probe.ts" <<'TS'
class MinStack {
private stack: number[] = [];
private minStack: number[] = [];
top(): number {
return this.stack.at(-1);
}
getMin(): number {
return this.minStack.at(-1);
}
}
TS
tsc --ignoreConfig --noEmit --strict "$tmpdir/probe.ts"Repository: Faustze/notes
Length of output: 1912
Coerce at(-1) before returning from typed methods.
stack.at(-1) and minStack.at(-1) return number | undefined, so top() and getMin() violate their declared number return types under strict null checks. Use the non-null assertion already used elsewhere for guaranteed non-empty stack access.
Suggested fix
top(): number {
- return this.stack.at(-1);
+ return this.stack.at(-1)!;
}
getMin(): number {
- return this.minStack.at(-1);
+ return this.minStack.at(-1)!;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| top(): number { | |
| return this.stack.at(-1); | |
| } | |
| getMin(): number { | |
| return this.minStack.at(-1); | |
| } | |
| top(): number { | |
| return this.stack.at(-1)!; | |
| } | |
| getMin(): number { | |
| return this.minStack.at(-1)!; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Stack/155-min-stack.md` around lines 32 - 38, Update
top() and getMin() to apply the existing non-null assertion pattern to
stack.at(-1) and minStack.at(-1), respectively, so both methods satisfy their
declared number return types while preserving the current access behavior.
| function isValid(s: string): boolean { | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Implement isValid before publishing this solution.
The function body is empty, so every example returns undefined instead of the documented boolean result.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/String/20-valid-parentheses.md` around lines 13 - 15,
Implement the empty isValid function to evaluate whether the input string
contains properly matched and nested parentheses, brackets, and braces,
returning a boolean for every input. Use a stack-based approach that matches
each closing delimiter with its corresponding opener and rejects mismatches or
leftover openers.
| let object = { ...context } as any | ||
| let symbol = Symbol('context') | ||
| // this здесь — это функция | ||
| object[symbol] = this | ||
| // Вызываем add как метод object | ||
| return object[symbol](...args) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
# Locate and inspect the target file and nearby test/solution context without running repo code.
target="content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2693-call-function-with-custom-context.md"
if [ -f "$target" ]; then
echo "== target exists =="
wc -l "$target"
echo "== target lines 1-80 =="
sed -n '1,80p' "$target" | cat -n
else
echo "target not found"
fd -i '2693-call-function-with-custom-context|CustomContext|callPolyfill' .
fi
echo "== occurrences of callPolyfill / context spread in repo =="
rg -n "function.*callPolyfill|method: context|callPolyfill|{ ...context }|Object\.assign|Function\.prototype\.call" . || trueRepository: Faustze/notes
Length of output: 3116
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "== JS spread identity/prototype behavior =="
node - <<'JS'
const proto = { inherited: 1, nonEnumerable: 2 };
proto.nonEnumerable = 2;
Object.defineProperty(proto, 'nonEnumerable', { value: 2, enumerable: false });
const context = Object.create(proto);
context.own = 0;
const cloned = { ...context };
console.log(JSON.stringify({
identity: Object.is(context, cloned),
own: cloned.own,
inherited: cloned.inherited,
nonEnumerable: cloned.nonEnumerable,
ownKeys: Object.keys(Object.create(null)),
enumerableOwnSymbols: Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(cloned).length
}));
let seenThis;
function check() { seenThis = Object.is(this, context) }
context.callPolyfill = function () {};
Object.assign(context, { callPolyfill() {} });
const object = { ...context };
object.check = check;
object.check();
console.log(JSON.stringify({ spreadsFunctionCallsWithProtoAndNonEnumerable: context.check(), clonedCallsWithProtoAndNonEnumerable: object.check() }));
const context2 = { a: 1 };
const cloned2 = { ...context2 };
cloned2.check = function () { return Object.is(this, context2) };
cloned2.check();
console.log(JSON.stringify({ clonedDoesNotPreserveIdentity: cloned2.check() }));
JSRepository: Faustze/notes
Length of output: 1059
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
node - <<'JS'
const proto = { inherited: 1 };
const nonEnumerable = { nonEnumerable: 2 };
Object.defineProperty(nonEnumerable, 'nonEnumerable', { value: 2, enumerable: false });
const context = Object.create(proto);
Object.assign(context, { own: 0, ...nonEnumerable });
const cloned = Object.assign({}, context);
console.log(JSON.stringify({
identity: Object.is(context, cloned),
own: cloned.own,
inherited: cloned.inherited,
nonEnumerable: cloned.nonEnumerable,
enumerableOwnSymbols: Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(cloned).length
}));
let seenThis;
function check() { seenThis = Object.is(this, context) }
context.check = check;
const object = Object.assign({}, context);
object.check = check;
object.check();
console.log(JSON.stringify({ originalContextPreservesPrototypeAndNonEnumerable: context.check(), clonedContextLosesPrototypeAndNonEnumerable: object.check() }));
const context2 = { a: 1 };
const cloned2 = Object.assign({}, context2);
cloned2.check = function () { return Object.is(this, context2) };
cloned2.check();
console.log(JSON.stringify({ clonedDoesNotPreserveIdentity: cloned2.check() }));
const target = { a: 1 };
Reflect.setPrototypeOf(target, { inherited: 2 });
const spreadTarget = { ...target };
const spreadWithOwnSymbol = { ...target, [Symbol.iterator]: 0 };
console.log(JSON.stringify({ symbolOverwritesProtoSymbols: Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(spreadWithOwnSymbol).some(s => s === Symbol.iterator) }));
JSRepository: Faustze/notes
Length of output: 284
Preserve the original this context.
{ ...context } creates a new object, so identity checks fail; Reflect.ownKeys(Object.assign({}, context)) and { ...context } also drop the inherited prototype chain and non-enumerable own properties, while spread copies Symbol keys before prototype properties. Use the supplied context directly, assign the wrapper property, call through it, then clean it up.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@content-ru/leetcode/Untagged/2693-call-function-with-custom-context.md`
around lines 20 - 25, Update the wrapper logic around the context object to use
the supplied context directly instead of creating a spread copy, preserving its
identity, prototype chain, and non-enumerable properties. Assign the temporary
symbol property to that original context, invoke the function through it, and
remove the temporary property afterward while preserving the existing argument
forwarding behavior.
Summary by CodeRabbit