Skip to content

chore(release): version packages - #1953

Open
openspec-release-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
changeset-release/main
Open

openspec-release-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
changeset-release/main

Conversation

@openspec-release-bot

@openspec-release-bot openspec-release-bot Bot commented Sep 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.

Releases

@fission-ai/openspec@1.13.2

Patch Changes

  • #1940 0b5ce44 Thanks @clay-good! - Keep fast-forward clarification guidance and onboarding task approval consistent across generated skills and commands. Fast-forward now asks only when context is critically unclear, while onboarding asks users to approve the task breakdown before saving it and separately asks whether to begin implementation.

  • #1885 fd56e12 Thanks @philo-x! - Fix artifact output resolution to recognize brace expansion and extglob patterns while preserving literal output filenames and confining brace-expanded paths to the change directory.

  • #1744 5b55263 Thanks @javigomez! - Clarify the Codex setup hint for CLI, IDE, and desktop app users.

  • #1809 a5ceea3 Thanks @ryandemelo! - Say what a MODIFIED block adds when the scenario-loss guard fires (#1809). openspec validate and openspec archive already named the scenarios a block omits. They now also print how many scenarios each side has and which ones the block introduces, capped at three names, so a rename and a truncation read differently without opening either file. The guard catches exactly what it did before, and no exit code changes.

  • #1939 a64303f Thanks @clay-good! - Return a nonzero exit status when openspec update --force cannot replace a legacy-only Codex installation.

  • #1769 d3d7707 Thanks @kikeprzn! - Fix openspec archive leaving .openspec-archive.lock behind on Windows. Node can report dev: 0n from a path stat while the open file handle reports the real volume id, so the claim-ownership check never matched and the stale lock blocked every later archive. The check now treats an absent device id as unavailable while still requiring the inode and the claim's contents to match before unlinking.

@openspec-release-bot
openspec-release-bot Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner September 22, 2026 17:40
@openspec-release-bot
openspec-release-bot Bot requested review from clay-good and removed request for a team September 22, 2026 17:40
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: Fission-AI/OpenSpec/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: c4cfdf1f-b2b7-458c-bdf1-020e87060858

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@openspec-cloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No PR-relevant drift confirmed.

AI-generated · A citation proves the line exists, not that it makes the case — verify before acting.
Checked the 0 requirements selected for this PR at a07b5f4 (255 total).
This is not a full-repository clean result; see the check for coverage and any broader findings.
View results · Click Refresh, then Scan again in the check. Or comment /openspec-cloud.

@openspec-release-bot
openspec-release-bot Bot force-pushed the changeset-release/main branch 10 times, most recently from da948c5 to c59c9df Compare September 22, 2026 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants