data(soc): fill gpu_cores for 248 SoCs the earlier pass missed

[Seungpyo1007]

What

248 SoC records gain gpu_cores — coverage 9% → 21% — read from the vendor's own core-count notation in the gpu_name the record already carries.

Why there is more to do here after #51

#51 did this derivation in June and filled 139 SoCs, after which the work was recorded as finished. It wasn't: its pattern required a word boundary before MP, so it matched PowerVR SGX543MP3 but silently skipped every name where the suffix follows a digit — Mali-G76MP12, Mali-T880MP4, ARM Mali-G52MP2. Those 248 records have been sitting empty since.

Correctness

• Cross-checked against the 138 records that already hold gpu_cores: all 138 agree with what their name encodes, zero conflicts. That is the rule validating itself on a held-out set.
• Several names carry a second, independent statement of the same fact — PowerVR SGX543MP4 (quad-core graphics) — and the two always agree.
• Names that spell the count out instead of using MP<n> are also read (PowerVR GXA6850 (octa-core graphics), Apple GPU (7-core graphics)) — 6 records.
• Records that already hold a value are skipped, never overwritten; only counts in 1–128 are accepted.

Nothing external is consulted, so no new source is claimed: the value comes from a field the record already has, backed by its existing source_urls.

Deliberately not done

cpu_config is not derived from raw_chipset. Vendor marketing strings misdescribe the topology — Tegra 3's "penta-core" is a 4+1 arrangement — so a bulk derivation would encode a structure that is simply wrong. That field needs a real per-SoC source.

python -m app.validate → Data validation passed. Dump refreshed for the 248 changed pages only (3,961 timestamp-only pages left alone).

Closes #1

[TechEngineBot]

🔎 Data verification — Tier 0 (offline existence/trust)

Scored by app.verify; posted by TechEngineBot. Informational only — the structural gate (app.validate) is separate and authoritative for merge.

Changed records in this PR

332 record(s) scored.

%%{init: {"theme":"base","themeVariables":{"pie1":"#3fb950","pie2":"#d29922","pie3":"#f85149","pieStrokeWidth":"0px","pieOpacity":"1"}}}%%
pie showData
    title Verification bands — all records
    "Green" : 2
    "Yellow" : 330
    "Red" : 0

Loading

Category	Distribution	Total	🟢	🟡	🔴	🟢 %
soc	🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨	248	0	248	0	0.0%
cpu	🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨	84	2	82	0	2.4%
All	🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨	332	2	330	0	0.6%

Full-dataset baseline

105742 record(s) scored.

%%{init: {"theme":"base","themeVariables":{"pie1":"#3fb950","pie2":"#d29922","pie3":"#f85149","pieStrokeWidth":"0px","pieOpacity":"1"}}}%%
pie showData
    title Verification bands — all records
    "Green" : 14622
    "Yellow" : 89331
    "Red" : 1789

Loading

Category	Distribution	Total	🟢	🟡	🔴	🟢 %
brand	🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨	207	24	183	0	11.6%
soc	🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥	2104	123	804	1177	5.8%
smartphone	🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥	93396	11602	81206	588	12.4%
tablet	🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥	3455	174	3266	15	5.0%
watch	🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥	433	11	415	7	2.5%
pda	🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥	140	27	112	1	19.3%
gpu	🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨	2030	245	1785	0	12.1%
cpu	🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥	3977	2416	1560	1	60.7%
All	🟩🟩🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟥	105742	14622	89331	1789	13.8%

Hard violations (forced red):

Count	Check
1	!boost_ge_base

_{green = authoritative source + complete + consistent · yellow = plausible, needs confirmation · red = sparse/weak source or a hard contradiction. Promotion to verified runs in the scheduled verify-network workflow.}

[TechEngineBot]

TechEngine change review: PASS

• PR: data(soc): fill gpu_cores for 248 SoCs the earlier pass missed #136
• Ref: data/soc-gpu-cores-mp-suffix
• Commit: 8b3a534
• Requested by: @Seungpyo1007
• Run: https://github.com/GetTechAPI/TechEngine/actions/runs/30447847306

Check	Result
python -m app.validate	PASS
python integrity_check.py TechAPI/data --strict	PASS

Changed data

Category	Added	Modified	Deleted	Added verified	Added unverified	Added Kaggle-sourced
brand	0	0	0	0	0	0
soc	0	0	0	0	0	0
smartphone	0	0	0	0	0	0
tablet	0	0	0	0	0	0
watch	0	0	0	0	0	0
pda	0	0	0	0	0	0
gpu	0	0	0	0	0	0
cpu	0	84	0	0	0	0

Changed record examples

cpu modified

• cpu/amd/2008/consumer/amd-athlon-64-3700-plus.json - AMD Athlon 64 3700+
• cpu/amd/2008/consumer/amd-athlon-64-x2-dual-core-3600-plus.json - AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3600+
• cpu/amd/2008/consumer/amd-athlon-64-x2-dual-core-4000-plus.json - AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4000+
• cpu/amd/2008/consumer/amd-athlon-64-x2-dual-core-4400-plus.json - AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+
• cpu/amd/2008/consumer/amd-athlon-64-x2-dual-core-4600-plus.json - AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
• cpu/amd/2008/consumer/amd-athlon-64-x2-dual-core-4800-plus.json - AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+
• cpu/amd/2008/consumer/amd-athlon-64-x2-dual-core-5200-plus.json - AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
• cpu/amd/2008/consumer/amd-sempron-2400-plus.json - AMD Sempron 2400+
• cpu/amd/2008/consumer/amd-sempron-2800-plus.json - AMD Sempron 2800+
• cpu/amd/2008/consumer/amd-sempron-3800-plus.json - AMD Sempron 3800+
• cpu/amd/2009/consumer/amd-athlon-64-fx-74.json - AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
• cpu/amd/2009/consumer/amd-athlon-64-x2-dual-core-5800-plus.json - AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+
• cpu/amd/2009/consumer/amd-phenom-ii-x2-545.json - AMD Phenom II X2 545
• cpu/amd/2009/consumer/amd-phenom-ii-x2-550.json - AMD Phenom II X2 550
• cpu/amd/2009/consumer/amd-phenom-ii-x2-b53.json - AMD Phenom II X2 B53
• ... 69 more

Heuristic review

• Heuristic warnings: none found.

[TechEngineBot]

TechEngine validation stats: PASS

• PR: data(soc): fill gpu_cores for 248 SoCs the earlier pass missed #136
• Ref: data/soc-gpu-cores-mp-suffix
• Commit: 8b3a534
• Run: https://github.com/GetTechAPI/TechEngine/actions/runs/30447847306

Data summary

Category	Total	Verified	Unverified	Missing verified	Tracked	Verified % of tracked
brand	207	10	197	0	207	4.8%
soc	2104	123	1981	0	2104	5.8%
smartphone	93396	8453	84943	0	93396	9.1%
tablet	3455	174	3281	0	3455	5.0%
watch	433	11	422	0	433	2.5%
pda	140	27	113	0	140	19.3%
gpu	2030	244	1786	0	2030	12.0%
cpu	3977	986	2991	0	3977	24.8%
all	105742	10028	95714	0	105742	9.5%

Warning

Tracked verified coverage is below 50% for watch 2.5% (11/433), brand 4.8% (10/207), tablet 5.0% (174/3455), soc 5.8% (123/2104), smartphone 9.1% (8453/93396), all 9.5% (10028/105742), gpu 12.0% (244/2030), pda 19.3% (27/140), and 1 more.
Tracked coverage excludes records missing the verified field; see the Missing verified column for those records.
This does not fail validation. Keep imported records verified: false until manual audit, but treat this as follow-up verification work before relying on the affected categories as curated data.

Validation notes

• Full advisory outlier listings are suppressed on successful runs because they are dataset-wide and mostly stable between PRs.
• Failure runs still include a detailed log excerpt for debugging.

Key output:

## app.validate
## integrity_check.py --strict
loaded CPU=3977 GPU=2030
✅ integrity gate: no hard anomalies.

Integrity section	Flagged lines
structural	0
CPU name/tier consistency (desktop mainstream only)	0
CPU single>multi (cinebench/geekbench — should be multi>=single)	0
CPU era-vs-score outliers	8
CPU cross-source ratio outliers (possible wrong-variant)	152
GPU cross-source ratio outliers + sanity	18