Skip to content

Conversation

@tarun-google
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @tarun-google, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new Dataflow Flex Template for batch data migration, enabling seamless transfer from PostgreSQL databases to Apache Iceberg tables. The template utilizes a YAML-driven approach for pipeline definition and parameterization, making it highly configurable and reusable. Key changes include the implementation of modular option files for JDBC and Iceberg configurations, alongside significant enhancements to the YAML processing logic to support advanced Jinja templating and dynamic handling of optional parameters. This ensures a robust and flexible solution for data integration between these systems.

Highlights

  • New Flex Template: Introduced a new Dataflow Flex Template, Postgres_To_Iceberg_Yaml, designed for batch data transfer from PostgreSQL to Apache Iceberg.
  • YAML-based Configuration: The template leverages a YAML definition (PostgresToIceberg.yaml) for pipeline structure and parameterization, enhancing flexibility.
  • Modular Options: New postgres_options.yaml and iceberg_options.yaml files were added to define reusable parameter sets for JDBC and Iceberg configurations, respectively.
  • Jinja Templating Enhancements: The main.py script was updated to support advanced Jinja templating within YAML, including handling of optional parameters and merging of modular options.
  • Comprehensive Testing: A new integration test (PostgresToIcebergYamlIT.java) and unit tests (test_main.py) were added to validate the end-to-end functionality and new YAML processing utilities.
Ignored Files
  • Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (1)
    • .github/workflows/java-pr.yml
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 50.41%. Comparing base (5bdcf59) to head (5eb51e7).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #3057      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     50.42%   50.41%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     5022     5016       -6     
============================================
  Files           969      969              
  Lines         59548    59548              
  Branches       6493     6493              
============================================
- Hits          30030    30021       -9     
- Misses        27397    27402       +5     
- Partials       2121     2125       +4     
Components Coverage Δ
spanner-templates 70.62% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
spanner-import-export 68.93% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
spanner-live-forward-migration 80.02% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
spanner-live-reverse-replication 77.49% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
spanner-bulk-migration 88.27% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
see 4 files with indirect coverage changes
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant