-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
added table level config parameter for fetch size #3109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @sm745052, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the data pipeline by introducing a table-level configuration for the JDBC fetch size. This modification provides more granular control over how data is retrieved from source databases, allowing for performance optimization on a per-table basis. The changes involve updating the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is ❌ Your patch check has failed because the patch coverage (20.68%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3109 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 50.79% 56.03% +5.23%
+ Complexity 5106 1713 -3393
============================================
Files 975 474 -501
Lines 59984 26780 -33204
Branches 6552 2825 -3727
============================================
- Hits 30468 15005 -15463
+ Misses 27375 10878 -16497
+ Partials 2141 897 -1244
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
No description provided.