[HackingGate]

Bumps serde-saphyr from 1.3.0 to 2.0.0.

• Release notes
• Changelog
• Commits

---

updated-dependencies:

• dependency-name: serde-saphyr
  dependency-version: 2.0.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
  ...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] support@github.com
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
https://claude.ai/code/session_01HM96sKSAyDhLk9smu82u5V

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the list of permitted licenses to include the permissive, OSI-approved Zlib license.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: defaults
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 90975e3e-17dc-4449-9afb-ddfbdfaaa19d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0051e77 and 92fb286.

📒 Files selected for processing: 1

• deny.toml

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📝 Walkthrough

The license allowlist now includes Zlib. A comment identifies foldhash as the dependency associated with this license.

Changes: License allowlist

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Permit the Zlib license deny.toml	The permitted-license list adds Zlib. A comment identifies foldhash and describes the license.

Priority: ➖ Normal

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 92fb2

No actionable merge-blocking risk remains.

Pre-merge checks: 5

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check		Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check		The title clearly identifies the main change: allowing the Zlib licence in cargo-deny because foldhash uses it through serde_json 1.0.154.
Docstring Coverage		No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.84%. Comparing base (0051e77) to head (92fb286).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #412   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.84%   94.84%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines       27217    27217           
=======================================
  Hits        25815    25815           
  Misses       1402     1402           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.