Skip to content

docs(proof): expand governance saves ledger#61

Merged
raylee-hawkins merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feature/governance-saves-ledger-expansion
May 30, 2026
Merged

docs(proof): expand governance saves ledger#61
raylee-hawkins merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feature/governance-saves-ledger-expansion

Conversation

@raylee-hawkins
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@raylee-hawkins raylee-hawkins commented May 27, 2026

Summary

Expands the HawkinsOperations Governance Saves ledger with a dedicated May 2026 promotion-control evidence section covering where governance stopped unsafe merge, publication, public-proof, stale-truth, dirty-state, website-route, runtime-claim, and disposition-claim promotion paths.

Refresh status

Changed files

  • docs/governance-saves/GOVERNANCE-SAVES-CANDIDATES.md
  • docs/governance-saves/GOVERNANCE-SAVES-EVIDENCE-MATRIX.md

Governance saves added

  • GS-071: PR docs(proof): update governance saves evidence lane #59 draft-stop respected before mark-ready / merge.
  • GS-072: Green checks not treated as merge authority.
  • GS-073: PR fix(proof): redact local logbook paths from governance saves #60 public proof path-redaction gate.
  • GS-074: Public issue-body path exposure held public-surface readiness partial until cleanup.
  • GS-075: Generated Python cache / dirty branch state blocked telemetry merge and cleanup flow.
  • GS-076: Platform issue Record HO-DET-001 synthetic validation proof #2 stale Cribl truth reconciled instead of promoted.
  • GS-077: RS003 Cribl route boundary stayed narrow and non-public.
  • GS-078: Website dirty state kept website-dependent work separate from proof and SOCaaS packet work.
  • GS-079: AI support-only boundary preserved human authority.
  • GS-080: Aggregate blocked-claim ceiling recorded as report-only, not a countable production save.

Control type explanation

  • REAL_CONTROL: used only where work actually stopped on dirty/generated state or verifier-enforced AI support boundaries.
  • SOFT_ENFORCEMENT: used where visible governance review, PR packets, or issue-truth reconciliation stopped promotion or overclaiming.
  • REPORT_ONLY: used for the aggregate claim-ceiling row because it documents a boundary and should not be inflated into a counted save.

SOCaaS transfer value

Each new row includes a transfer line that maps the save to SOCaaS detection governance: blocking stale detection status, separating internal telemetry from customer-safe proof, requiring human approval before AI-supported triage becomes disposition, and preventing website or issue-tracker drift from becoming customer-facing truth.

Claim boundary

This PR keeps proof records below runtime, signal, public-safe, production, customer, fleet, autonomous, AI-disposition, and analyst-disposition promotion. Human review remains authority, and green CI remains validation evidence only.

Validation commands and results

  • git diff --check: passed
  • python -B scripts\verify_detection_proof_status_index.py: passed
  • python -B scripts\verify_proof_integrity.py: passed
  • python -B scripts\verify-ho-det-001-proof-integrity.py: passed
  • python -B scripts\verify-proof-pack-001-release.py: passed
  • python -B scripts\verify-proof-pack-001-zip.py --check: passed

Private/path scan result

Required scan over the changed governance-saves files returned zero email, local path, private IP, secret-assignment, private/person-name, exact forbidden contact/call label, and generated-file hits. Blocked-risk terms appear only in blocked, not-claimed, route-name, or no-claim contexts.

Explicit non-claims

This PR does not claim production prevention, customer deployment, SOCaaS deployment or availability, public-safe runtime proof, autonomous SOC, AI-approved disposition, analyst-approved disposition, FortiSIEM integration proven, or broad live telemetry proof.

@raylee-hawkins
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Governance-saves ledger completion update:

  • Pushed commit 48633e745d5dfe2fb7df2b91e73dbb1f19a7ca01 to feature/governance-saves-ledger-expansion.
  • Scope remains limited to docs/governance-saves/GOVERNANCE-SAVES-CANDIDATES.md and docs/governance-saves/GOVERNANCE-SAVES-EVIDENCE-MATRIX.md.
  • GS-081 through GS-083 were reviewed as claim-control entries, not production/runtime proof.
  • Proof boundary review passed: no private/local path exposure, no proof ceiling promotion, and forbidden terms appear only in blocked/not-claimed/do-not-claim contexts.
  • Validation passed:
    • python -B scripts\verify_detection_proof_status_index.py
    • python -B scripts\verify_proof_integrity.py
    • python -B scripts\verify-ho-det-001-proof-integrity.py
    • python -B scripts\verify-proof-pack-001-release.py
    • python -B scripts\verify-proof-pack-001-zip.py --check
    • git diff --check
    • targeted forbidden-claim scan
    • manual schema checklist

Proof ceiling remains unchanged: this PR documents governance claim-control behavior only. It does not claim production deployment, live SOC operation, runtime-active detection, signal-observed detection, customer impact, financial savings, autonomous AI security authority, AI-approved disposition, or analyst-approved disposition.

@raylee-hawkins raylee-hawkins marked this pull request as ready for review May 30, 2026 06:11
@raylee-hawkins
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Governance Saves Ledger Expansion merge gate rechecked.

  • Branch refreshed against current main.
  • Changed files remain scoped to the governance-saves ledger.
  • Validations passed.
  • Proof boundaries remain below runtime, signal, public-safe, production, customer, fleet, autonomous, AI-disposition, and analyst-disposition promotion.
  • Green CI remains validation evidence only, not merge authority.
  • No private/path/raw-evidence leakage found.

Ready for governed merge.

@raylee-hawkins raylee-hawkins merged commit 106dee3 into main May 30, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant