wasm-component-ld 0.5.10 (new formula), wasi-runtimes: depend on wasm-component-ld

[carlocab]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

This is needed to enable the rust formula to target WASI, and will
enable us to remove existing uses of rustup at build-time.

brew audit --new fails because of the notability check, but I think we
can/should make an exception for this.

[cho-m]

I think there is a vendored copy in Rust and a wrapper around it https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/1.82.0/src/tools/wasm-component-ld. It is currently built, but haven't checked if this was intended, e.g.

❯ fd wasm-component-ld /opt/homebrew/opt/rust/
/opt/homebrew/opt/rust/lib/rustlib/aarch64-apple-darwin/bin/wasm-component-ld

❯ /opt/homebrew/opt/rust/lib/rustlib/aarch64-apple-darwin/bin/wasm-component-ld --version
wasm-component-ld 0.5.7

[carlocab]

Yep, I found that, but after testing it (for wasm-wasip2 target at #195823) didn't seem to work. Not sure if I was just using it wrong.

[cho-m]

Having a separate formula is also fine.

I also wasn't sure if Rust was supposed to include the wasm-component-ld. I did see there was a PR to change build condition at rust-lang/rust#130034 (merged but planned for 1.83.0)

[github-actions]

🤖 An automated task has requested bottles to be published to this PR.