split AnonymizedFieldTypeNames

[jo-pol]

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR closes:

• Closes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Suggestions on how to test this:

• Set the database setting like this (note the comma's without spaces):

curl -X PUT -d "author,datasetContact,contributor,depositor,grantNumber,publication,distributor,producer" http://localhost:8080/api/admin/settings/:AnonymizedFieldTypeNames

• Create a draft dataset and request an anonymized preview URL.
• Log out
• Try the URL

Before applying the change, no fields are withheld, after the deploy fields, we get the expected behavior

Does this PR introduce a user interface change? If mockups are available, please link/include them here:

Is there a release notes update needed for this change?:

Additional documentation:

[coveralls]

coverage: 23.552%. remained the same
when pulling 9008d56 on DANS-KNAW-jp:split-AnonymizedFieldTypeNames
into 195a584 on IQSS:develop.

[pdurbin]

Seems reasonable. Needs to be tested.

[stevenwinship]

Without fix:

With fix:

[stevenwinship]

RE: Set the database setting like this (note the comma's without spaces)

I tested with both spaces author, datasetContact,... and no spaces author,datasetContact,...
Both were successful.

[jo-pol]

Without pointing at anyone specific, there seems to be some miscommunication. The issue was also tackled by the still open #11745 this merge causes merge conflicts.

[stevenwinship]

@jo-pol Would you like this merge reverted?

[jo-pol]

@jo-pol Would you like this merge reverted?

No, @qqmyers explained this was to be sure to get it in v6.9 and give me credits.