Repository navigation
Conversation
…an-evidence refactor(validation): separate project plan and evidence authority
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
check) and formatting validation (format_check) to the existingproject_validategateway, alongside the established Python pytest, Rust, and Go paths.pyproject.tomlRuff configuration with an explicit target version and stable manifest provenance. Revalidate the plan at Job admission and after queueing.python -I -B -m ruffsteps. Lint and format validation keep file modifications disabled.Verification
cargo fmt --all -- --checkandgit diff --check: passed.fix=trueandfix-only=true, and left no Ruff or bytecode cache. A project-localruff.pywas not executed. The temporary environment was removed.This fork PR is the full-CI validation lane before considering an upstream contribution. Part of yyjeqhc#962.