docs(goal): operationalize anti-anchoring in inner-review prompt (#81)#82
Merged
Conversation
Augment the step 5b reviewer subagent instruction with three concrete directives instead of relying on a vague "fresh eyes" idiom (too weak to steer a small model like haiku): 1. anti-anchoring — judge the diff on its own merits, do not assume it is correct just because it was written in the same session (the guard against rubber-stamping) 2. exploratory framing — actively hunt acceptance-criteria gaps and convention violations; gate2 is authoritative so a false positive is cheap while a miss is costly 3. evidence-grounded findings — cite file:line and the concrete failure mode Wording-only: no behavioral/flag/state changes; gate2 stays the authoritative gate, the inner pass stays a cheap pre-filter, and the directives are model-agnostic. Closes #81 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Augments the
/goalstep 5b cheap inner-review tier instruction (commands/goal.md) so the Haiku reviewer subagent gets three concrete directives instead of a vague "fresh eyes" idiom (too weak to steer a small model):file:lineand the concrete failure mode.Scope
Wording-only. No behavioral / flag / state changes: gate2 (5c) remains the authoritative gate, the inner pass stays a cheap pre-filter (empty findings still backstopped by gate2), and the directives are model-agnostic (apply whether the inner-review model is
haikuor an override).Closes #81
🤖 Generated with Claude Code