docs: update plugin upload and add Xquik example - #2
Conversation
|
@kriptoburak is attempting to deploy a commit to the kpz231's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation in ChangesPlugin upload and widget documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/plugins.md`:
- Around line 857-860: The fenced request example in the plugin upload
documentation is missing a language tag, which triggers MD040. Update the fenced
block around the POST /api/plugins/upload example in docs/plugins.md to use an
http label so the request is easier to scan and the markdown linter passes.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
Summary:
POST /api/plugins/uploadworkflow and returned identifiers.requirecalls.Validation:
git diff --checkrequirecall.npm run lint,npm test, andnpm run buildwere run. They remain blocked by unrelated baseline failures: a React purity violation, missing generated Prisma client, storage-test environment setup, and an existing language-validation test failure.Xquik is an independent third-party service. Not affiliated with X Corp. "Twitter" and "X" are trademarks of X Corp.
Summary by CodeRabbit