fix: add missing ARM64 tokenizer dependency for Docker

[wasim-builds]

Hey! The Docker image was missing the ARM64 build of @anush008/tokenizers, causing the vector search to silently degrade. I've added @anush008/tokenizers-linux-arm64-gnu to the optionalDependencies so it gets picked up during the Docker build. Let me know if everything looks good!

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Improved Linux ARM64 compatibility by allowing compatible 0.5.x tokenizer versions.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: b49f87ec-b810-4e66-bd87-915dba7c241c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12a363e and 7bad475.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updates the optional Linux ARM64 tokenizer dependency in package.json to accept compatible 0.5.x versions.

Changes

Tokenizer dependency

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Optional ARM64 package version constraint package.json	Changes @anush008/tokenizers-linux-arm64-gnu from exact version 0.5.0 to ^0.5.0.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 7bad4

This localized dependency update is merge-ready after normal checks and review; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains.

Suggested reviewers: knockoutez

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly describes the ARM64 tokenizer dependency change for Docker builds. It matches the pull request objective and uses concise, specific wording.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[KnockOutEZ]

Hi @wasim-builds — thank you for this PR, and I'm sorry it's been sitting here without a proper review.

I've been heads-down building some pretty big features and improvements for wigolo, and as a solo dev, shipping that while also reviewing and maintaining every issue and PR has been genuinely hard. This one isn't forgotten — it just hasn't had the attention it deserves yet.

I'd really appreciate your patience here. I'm going to work through the open PRs and issues properly over the next few weeks (sooner if I can free up), and I'll follow up right here.

In the meantime, the wigolo Discord is open if you'd like to follow what's being built, ask questions, or nudge me directly: https://discord.gg/BkUUgz2bNF

Thanks again for contributing, and for understanding — it genuinely means a lot. 🙏