Document the nodoc build deviation - #13
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Danius Kalvaitis <danius@kurokesu.com>
DaniusKalv
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
nodocentry to the "Build-environment deviations (retirable)" section ofdebian/source/README.source, recording why the fork builds with--profiles=…,nodoc(skips the doxygen/sphinx/TeX doc toolchain and the doc-generation pass; the fork doesn't edit libcamera's docs and the archive doesn't shiplibcamera-doc) and when to retire it (when we start maintaining doc changes or want to publishlibcamera-doc).nodocwas already applied across both suites but was missing from the deviations list alongsidenonn/noqt/nocheck, so this also satisfies the file's own "Editing rule."