Open
Conversation
Contributor
✅ PR Deployed Successfully! 🚀Live Preview URLs:
Deployment Info:
🧪 Ready for testing! The application is now running with your PR changes. |
Author
|
@KaneAI validate this PR |
🚀 KaneAI Workflow Progress TrackerAutomated test case generation and execution for PR #88 🔄 Current StatusPR APPROVAL: Changes requested - some tests failed 📋 Test Cases
🧪 Test Run Management
📊 Reports
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 1/12/2026, 7:14:09 AM |
🧪 KaneAI Test Automation Progress📊 Test Authoring Status✅ All tests authored! 🔍 Test Case Details
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 1/12/2026, 7:05:22 AM |
🚀 KaneAI Test IntelligenceProject: Github Universe Demo New | Generated: 1/12/2026, 7:05:25 AM 💡 Smart Test DiscoveryKaneAI has intelligently analyzed your PR changes and found existing test cases in your repository that are related to the files you've modified. This helps you:
📋 Related Test Cases in Your Repository
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | Last updated: 1/12/2026, 7:05:25 AM |
🚀 KaneAI - Test Execution Dashboard
🔍 Quick Access Links
⚡ Active HyperExecute Jobs
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | 1/12/2026, 7:09:55 AM |
![lambdatest-ai-cloud[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/2159106?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔍 KaneAI - Test Execution Failed ❌
📊 Test Execution Summary
| 📊 Metric | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🧪 Total Tests | 11 |
| ✅ Passed | 1 |
| ❌ Failed | 10 |
| 📊 Success Rate | 9% |
| 🎯 Status | Failed |
🔍 Failed Tests Overview
| 📝 Test Title | 🔍 Root Cause | |
|---|---|---|
| Filter and Verify Property Listings by Location | UI Data Defect | 🟡 medium |
| Search for Location in Autocomplete | State Transition Bug | 🔴 high |
| Search for Apartments in Tampa, Florida | UI Data Defect | 🔴 high |
| Search for Properties in Noida | Locator Error | 🟡 medium |
| Search for Properties in New Delhi | UI Data Defect | 🔴 high |
📋 Detailed Test Analysis
1. Filter and Verify Property Listings by Location
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KERFW19PQ0WHX1JZJ4ZBPZ29 |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: The test failed because, after clearing the filters, the property list never showed an item containing 'Tampa, Florida, India', even though the test expected this text to be visible.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1/12/2026, 12:01:00 AM | 🔴 RC | After clearing filters, the vision check for 'Tampa, Florida, India' returned False and the first assertion for its presence failed. |
| 2 | 1/12/2026, 12:01:02 AM | 🟡 W | The tool retries the same check for 'Tampa, Florida, India'; the listing is still not found and the assertion fails again. |
| 3 | 1/12/2026, 12:01:04 AM | 🟡 W | Additional retries keep showing the assertion result as False, confirming that the expected listing never appears. |
| 4 | 1/12/2026, 12:01:06 AM | 🟡 W | While reporting the failed assertion, the test framework tries to include locator details and runs into a minor internal error (missing 'locator' field). |
2. Search for Location in Autocomplete
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KERFW1A1RJVSTJJB12TENFQD |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: State Transition Bug
- 📝 Summary: The test typed into the location search box, but the suggestion dropdown never appeared, so the step that checks 'autocomplete dropdown appears' failed and the test stopped.
⚠️ Severity: high
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:00 AM | 🔴 RC | The test typed into the location search box and then checked if the autocomplete dropdown was visible, but the vision check reported that the dropdown was not visible and the first assertion failed. |
| 2 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:02 AM | 🟡 W | The system retried the same check several times, and each time the dropdown still did not appear, so the assertion kept failing. |
| 3 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:05 AM | 🟡 W | While handling the failed assertion, the test script tried to include locator details in the error message but could not find them, causing an extra 'locator' key error. |
3. Search for Apartments in Tampa, Florida
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KERFW1AE0T14C1AFCSEP4BWQ |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: The test opened the site, but the expected home page view never appeared, so the 'home page loaded' check kept failing and stopped the scenario.
⚠️ Severity: high
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1/12/2026, 12:00:00 PM | 🔴 RC | The browser opened https://demo.lambdatestinternal.com/, but the visual probe reported that the home page marker was not present (home_page_loaded = False). |
| 2 | 1/12/2026, 12:00:01 PM | 🟡 W | The test checked 'Assert home page loaded', the result was False, and a runtime error was raised for this failed assertion. |
| 3 | 1/12/2026, 12:00:02 PM | 🟡 W | The test retried the 'home page loaded' check several times, and each retry still failed with the same assertion error. |
| 4 | 1/12/2026, 12:00:03 PM | 🟡 W | While wrapping the failed action, an additional error occurred when the framework tried to read a missing 'locator' field, leading to a KeyError. |
4. Search for Properties in Noida
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KBHE860GMRGR71F0X1SYYR2M |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: Locator Error
- 📝 Summary: The test failed to click the 'Noida, UP, India' suggestion because the recorded locator for that option no longer matches any element in the autocomplete dropdown.
⚠️ Severity: medium
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:00 AM | 🔴 RC | At the moment of trying to click the 'Noida, UP, India' suggestion, the test immediately reported that no matching element could be found using the stored locators. |
| 2 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:02 AM | 🟡 W | The browser was asked to find the suggestion button using a very long CSS path under the main page container, but it reported that no such element existed. |
| 3 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:04 AM | 🟡 W | The test tried several backup rules based on button classes and positions to find the same suggestion, but each attempt still reported that no matching element could be found. |
| 4 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:06 AM | 🟡 W | Auto-healing tried to recover by generating new locators, but it ran into an error and all retries ended with 'Element is not found', leading to a final click failure message. |
5. Search for Properties in New Delhi
| 📋 Property | 📈 Value |
|---|---|
| 🎯 Status | ❌ Failed |
| ⭐ Priority | High |
| 🌍 Environment | Linux Config 1 |
| 🤖 Automation Status | Automated |
| 🆔 Test Case ID | 01KB5FQFWQ31Y42S75VRYW41CG |
| 🔗 Test Results | View Details |
🔍 Root Cause Analysis:
- 📂 Category: UI Data Defect
- 📝 Summary: The website did not display the 'New Delhi, India' autocomplete option after typing 'New D', so the test’s check for that suggestion failed several times.
⚠️ Severity: high
📈 Error Timeline:
| 🔢 Step | 📅 Timestamp | 🎯 Status | 📝 Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:00 AM | 🔴 RC | After typing 'New D' into the location search box, the test scanned the screen for a suggestion reading 'New Delhi, India', but did not find it. |
| 2 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:01 AM | 🟡 W | The test reported that the expected 'New Delhi, India' suggestion was not visible and raised an error for this failed check. |
| 3 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:02 AM | 🟡 W | The test retried the same visibility check for 'New Delhi, India' several times, and each retry still showed the suggestion as not visible. |
| 4 | 1/12/2026, 10:00:03 AM | 🟡 W | After the repeated failed checks, a final error message was logged and the test run finished. |
🔗 Test Run Dashboard
✅ RCA Analysis: Root cause analysis has been completed (5/5 RCAs found).
Powered by LambdaTest KaneAI | 1/12/2026, 7:16:42 AM
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.