Skip to content

Code of Conduct v2.9 and purpose statement - #23

Merged
EdwinLuther01 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
coc/v2-9
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

EdwinLuther01 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
coc/v2-9

Conversation

@EdwinLuther01

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Code of Conduct updated to match the policy (v2.9). Public site gets a Code of Conduct page and the purpose statement. Consistency check passes: purpose identical across pages; both Code of Conduct copies match the policy.

Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings November 2, 2026 16:42
@EdwinLuther01
EdwinLuther01 merged commit 32dcc12 into main Nov 2, 2026
2 checks passed
@EdwinLuther01
EdwinLuther01 deleted the coc/v2-9 branch November 2, 2026 16:43

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Changes recommended

CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md incorrectly presents the mirrored .github copy as canonical and self-generated, obscuring the operations repository’s authority when policy copies differ.

1 open issue
What changed in this PR

Updates the repository’s published Code of Conduct from v2.0 to v2.9 to align with the Guild’s revised policy.

Changes:

  • Reorganizes the document into numbered policy sections with roles and version history.
  • Revises scope, reporting procedures, acknowledgement times, and record retention.
  • Clarifies enforcement, independent investigations, and review responsibilities.
File Description
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md Replaces the v2.0 mirror with the expanded v2.9 policy text.

Review effort: Balanced

Comment thread CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
Status: Draft, awaiting the Senior Leadership Team (SLT)

## Our pledge
This is the canonical Code of Conduct for the Manchester AI Guild. The copy in the Guild's GitHub `.github` repository and the page at manchesteraiguild.org/policies/code-of-conduct/ are generated from this file.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants