Skip to content

feat(agent-core-v2): round-trip reasoning_details in chat completions - #3492

Open
sailist wants to merge 1 commit into
MoonshotAI:mainfrom
sailist:feat-142-09-03-reasoning-details
Open

feat(agent-core-v2): round-trip reasoning_details in chat completions#3492
sailist wants to merge 1 commit into
MoonshotAI:mainfrom
sailist:feat-142-09-03-reasoning-details

Conversation

@sailist

@sailist sailist commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Related Issue

N/A — internal task: client-side phase 1 support for the OpenGW "thinking hiding + summary" rollout (no public issue).

Problem

OpenGW will hide raw model thinking from Chat Completions responses and instead send a readable summary plus an encrypted reasoning state that clients must replay verbatim on later turns. The wire shape is a new reasoning_details array (summary segments plus one trailing encrypted element, index-addressed when streaming) alongside the existing reasoning_content plaintext. Today kimi-code silently drops array-shaped reasoning_details — the reasoning extractor only accepts strings — and outbound history only echoes concatenated think text under a single reasoning key while discarding ThinkPart.encrypted. Once OpenGW makes reasoning_details mandatory on continuation (phase 2 rejects requests without it), multi-turn conversations would fail.

What changed

  • Inbound (OpenAI chat base, stream and non-stream): array-shaped reasoning_details is parsed into ThinkParts keyed by the element's index; the string reasoning dialect is only observed when no array is present. Elements whose type is not summary/encrypted are skipped, so OpenRouter's reasoning.* array dialect stays ignored as before.
  • Contract: ThinkPart gains detailsIndex; mergeInPlace refuses to merge think parts with different indices, so summary segment boundaries survive streaming and the array replays in original order (encrypted element last, delivered once).
  • Outbound: assistant history carrying details-origin think parts is serialized back to reasoning_details (summary segments in order plus the trailing encrypted element) together with reasoning_content (segment concatenation); messages without details keep the existing dialect behavior byte-for-byte.
  • Interruption: streamed thinking that never received its encrypted state is dropped from history on abort; thinking that already carries the ciphertext is kept and replayed on the next turn.
  • State manifest regenerated for the ThinkPart shape change.

Verification: focused kosong contract/provider and agent loop tests pass; the full agent-core-v2 suite passes except pre-existing environment-dependent region-marker tests on this machine; repo-wide typecheck and lint pass.

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have linked a related issue (external PRs: the issue must have a maintainer's /approve).
  • I have added tests that prove my feature works.
  • Ran gen-changesets skill, or this PR needs no changeset.
  • Ran gen-docs skill, or this PR needs no doc update.

- parse array-shaped reasoning_details from stream and non-stream
  responses into ThinkParts keyed by detailsIndex, preferring them
  over the reasoning_content string dialect
- keep summary segment boundaries in mergeInPlace so indexed
  segments never merge
- rebuild reasoning_details and reasoning_content verbatim on
  outbound assistant history
- drop interrupted thinking that never received its encrypted
  state; keep ciphertext-backed thinking replayable
- regenerate the state manifest for the ThinkPart shape change
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 714ef33

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@pkg-pr-new

pkg-pr-new Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
pnpm dlx https://pkg.pr.new/@moonshot-ai/kimi-code@714ef33
npx https://pkg.pr.new/@moonshot-ai/kimi-code@714ef33

commit: 714ef33

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 714ef33b53

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +436 to +438
const reasoningDetails = extractReasoningDetails(message);
if (reasoningDetails !== undefined) {
yield* convertReasoningDetails(reasoningDetails);

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Honor the explicitly configured reasoning key

When reasoningKey is explicitly configured and a response also contains an array-valued reasoning_details, this branch bypasses ReasoningKeyDialect.observe and accepts the array anyway. The resulting detailsIndex parts are subsequently serialized as reasoning_details plus reasoning_content, rather than under the configured key, so the explicit setting no longer pins the dialect as its existing contract and test describe; apply details detection only when no explicit key is set, in both response paths.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant