-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 303
[SkipRecovery] Fix get_json_object runtime path semantics [databricks] #15850
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
wjxiz1992
wants to merge
7
commits into
NVIDIA:main
Choose a base branch
from
wjxiz1992:fix/14290-get-json-object-runtime-semantics
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8919c92
fix: match get_json_object runtime path semantics
wjxiz1992 9a7812b
docs: clarify get_json_object runtime semantics
wjxiz1992 802b94a
Address JSON runtime semantics review
wjxiz1992 f3e6040
Address static JSON path semantics review
wjxiz1992 034fa1f
Keep JSON path parsers independently diffable
wjxiz1992 bc7d89b
Map Dataproc JSON path semantics by Spark shim
wjxiz1992 24d5feb
Merge branch 'main' into fix/14290-get-json-object-runtime-semantics
wjxiz1992 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I kept the GpuGetJsonObject plan assertion. GpuEquivalentExpressions.replaceMultiExpressions runs inside GpuProjectExec.internalDoExecuteColumnar while binding a GpuTieredProject, so it does not rewrite the Spark executedPlan tree inspected by exist_classes. Changing both assertions to GpuMultiGetJsonObject made the focused Spark 3.3 GPU IT fail; restoring GpuGetJsonObject passed both tests (2 passed).