Skip to content

[18.0][MIG] product_supplierinfo_barcode: Migration to 18.0#761

Open
deeniiz wants to merge 24 commits into
OCA:18.0from
nuobit:18.0-mig-product_supplierinfo_barcode
Open

[18.0][MIG] product_supplierinfo_barcode: Migration to 18.0#761
deeniiz wants to merge 24 commits into
OCA:18.0from
nuobit:18.0-mig-product_supplierinfo_barcode

Conversation

@deeniiz

@deeniiz deeniiz commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Module migrated to version 18.0

eLBati and others added 24 commits July 13, 2026 12:39
Add barcode field to supplier pricelis items (supplier info), so that it can used to search product by supplier barcodes.
Currently translated at 100.0% (5 of 5 strings)

Translation: stock-logistics-barcode-12.0/stock-logistics-barcode-12.0-product_supplierinfo_barcode
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-barcode-12-0/stock-logistics-barcode-12-0-product_supplierinfo_barcode/de/
Updated by "Update PO files to match POT (msgmerge)" hook in Weblate.

Translation: stock-logistics-barcode-15.0/stock-logistics-barcode-15.0-product_supplierinfo_barcode
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/stock-logistics-barcode-15-0/stock-logistics-barcode-15-0-product_supplierinfo_barcode/
Follow the OCA file-naming guideline (split models/views files by the
model involved, either created or inherited): rename supplierinfo.py to
product_supplierinfo.py matching core, group both product.supplierinfo
view inherits in product_supplierinfo_views.xml and keep the
product.template search view in product_template_views.xml.
@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added series:18.0 mod:product_supplierinfo_barcode Module product_supplierinfo_barcode labels Jul 13, 2026
@deeniiz

deeniiz commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@eantones, can you please review it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

mod:product_supplierinfo_barcode Module product_supplierinfo_barcode series:18.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants