Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughModified SDL key-down event handling in the input subsystem to filter out repeat events by checking the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/input.c (1)
202-209: Change is correct, but tests break due to uninitializedrepeatfield.The logic to filter out auto-repeat events is sound. However, the test in
test/test_input.c(lines 30-34) constructs anSDL_KeyboardEventwithout initializing therepeatfield:SDL_KeyboardEvent event; event.type = SDL_EVENT_KEY_DOWN; event.scancode = SDL_SCANCODE_W; event.key = SDLK_W; event.mod = SDL_KMOD_NONE; // event.repeat is uninitialized - contains garbageSince the code now checks
!event->key.repeatat line 202 but the test provides undefined values, the test will fail unpredictably.Fix: Initialize the
repeatfield or zero-initialize the struct:SDL_KeyboardEvent event = {0}; event.type = SDL_EVENT_KEY_DOWN; event.scancode = SDL_SCANCODE_W; event.key = SDLK_W; event.mod = SDL_KMOD_NONE;
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.