Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade requests from 2.31.0 to 2.33.0#192

Open
revan-zhang wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-b44f759818ce57aaa39fd485bae47608
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade requests from 2.31.0 to 2.33.0#192
revan-zhang wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
snyk-fix-b44f759818ce57aaa39fd485bae47608

Conversation

@revan-zhang

@revan-zhang revan-zhang commented Mar 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • python/requirements.txt

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Insecure Temporary File


Open with Devin

Note

Low Risk
Low risk dependency-only change; potential compatibility impact is limited to runtime HTTP behavior from the requests library upgrade.

Overview
Upgrades the Python dependency constraint for requests from >=2.4.0 to >=2.33.0 in python/requirements.txt to address a reported security vulnerability.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8516cc5. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-15763443
@revan-zhang

revan-zhang commented Mar 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

Fix All in Cursor

Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Comment thread python/requirements.txt
ecdsa>=0.9
mnemonic>=0.20
requests>=2.4.0
requests>=2.33.0

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New requests version breaks Python 3.6–3.9 support

Medium Severity

requests 2.33.0 requires Python 3.10+, but setup.py declares python_requires=">=3.6" and requirements.txt still includes markers for Python <3.7 (e.g., dataclasses). Users on Python 3.6–3.9 will encounter installation failures because no version of requests satisfies both >=2.33.0 and their Python version. The minimum requests constraint is now incompatible with the project's declared Python support range.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no potential bugs to report.

View in Devin Review to see 2 additional findings.

Open in Devin Review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants