Skip to content

Update README performance benchmark - #110

Merged
suguanYang merged 8 commits into
stagingfrom
docs/wangbinqi/update-performance-benchmark-screenshot-20260526
May 26, 2026
Merged

suguanYang merged 8 commits into
stagingfrom
docs/wangbinqi/update-performance-benchmark-screenshot-20260526

Conversation

@suguanYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • replace the README benchmark screenshot with the updated five-series landing chart
  • update benchmark copy to include Markitdown and avoid broad efficiency claims Markitdown does not support

Verification

@suguanYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Updated the benchmark screenshot to keep the original README image resolution: . Verification: docs/assets/benchmark.png: PNG image data, 2928 x 1446, 8-bit/color RGB, non-interlaced, 2928 1446, and .

@suguanYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Correction/update: I regenerated and pushed the benchmark screenshot at the original README image resolution: 2928x1446.

Verification:

  • file docs/assets/benchmark.png
  • identify -format '%w %h' docs/assets/benchmark.png -> 2928 1446
  • git diff --check

@suguanYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Updated the README benchmark screenshot again from the latest landing chart:

  • keeps the original image resolution: 2928x1446
  • includes the Unstructured logo in the chart legend
  • restores the original Efficiency bullet text per request

Verification:

  • file docs/assets/benchmark.png
  • identify -format '%w %h' docs/assets/benchmark.png -> 2928 1446
  • git diff --check

@suguanYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Updated the README benchmark screenshot after bolding Markitdown and Unstructured in the chart legend. The image still keeps the original 2928x1446 resolution.

Verification:

  • identify -format '%w %h' docs/assets/benchmark.png -> 2928 1446
  • git diff --check

@suguanYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Follow-up screenshot pushed:

  • Regenerated docs/assets/benchmark.png from the updated landing chart with Markitdown as the last benchmark series.
  • Kept the screenshot at the original README resolution: 2928x1446.
  • Markitdown/Unstructured labels use medium weight, not semibold.

Verification:

  • identify -format '%w %h' docs/assets/benchmark.png -> 2928 1446
  • git diff --check HEAD~1..HEAD

@suguanYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Follow-up screenshot pushed:

  • Regenerated docs/assets/benchmark.png with the new non-overlapping vertical value labels.
  • Screenshot remains at the original README resolution: 2928x1446.

Verification:

  • identify -format '%w %h' docs/assets/benchmark.png -> 2928 1446
  • git diff --check HEAD~1..HEAD

@suguanYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Follow-up screenshot pushed:

  • Regenerated docs/assets/benchmark.png with the gentler sloped value labels.
  • Screenshot remains at the original README resolution: 2928x1446.

Verification:

  • identify -format '%w %h' docs/assets/benchmark.png -> 2928 1446
  • git diff --check HEAD~1..HEAD

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant