Repository navigation
Verify run manifests before trusting artifacts - #175
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR adds a small but high-leverage reproducibility gate: a run-manifest verifier.
The repo already generates
run_manifest.json, but a manifest is only useful if someone can cheaply verify that the recorded inputs still match their hashes and that the named outputs still exist. Without that check, downstream review can accidentally trust a stale or partially missing artifact set.Changes
openamp_foundry.reproducibility.verify_run_manifest().scripts/release/verify_run_manifest.pyCLI.Why this matters
This strengthens the repository's evidence layer without adding any biological claims. It makes the existing reproducibility standard operational: the manifest becomes a verifiable object, not just metadata.
Tests
Not run locally in this environment; CI is the source of truth for this PR.