Skip to content

fix(docs): correct SEED-009 Met omission + track PRs #105/#106 - #97

Merged
cschanhniem merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/seed009-met-fix-and-tracking
Jun 28, 2026
Merged

cschanhniem merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/seed009-met-fix-and-tracking

Conversation

@cschanhniem

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Critical doc fix: SEED-009 synthesis guidance had a factual error

docs/WET_LAB_HANDOFF.md line 409 previously read:

No Met, no Cys → standard Fmoc SPPS.

This is wrong: SEED-009_VAR_033 (RRLPRPGYMPRP) has Met at position 9. The presynth QC report already flags this with MET×1 (Nle recommendation), but the synthesis guidance section contradicted it — a synthesis team reading only the special notes section would order a standard synthesis and miss the Nle substitution.

Corrected to:

  • VAR_033: Met at position 9 — Nle substitution recommended, HPLC purity mandatory at receipt, −80°C inert-atmosphere storage (same protocol as SEED-007); QC report carries both MET×1 and PROLINE_RICH_INTRACELLULAR simultaneously
  • VAR_027, VAR_017, VAR_039: no Met, no Cys → standard Fmoc SPPS

Tracking updates

Test plan

  • Full pytest — 1311/1311 pass (no code changes)
  • Verify: grep "VAR_033" docs/WET_LAB_HANDOFF.md mentions Met at position 9

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

WET_LAB_HANDOFF.md: SEED-009 synthesis guidance said "No Met, no Cys"
for all variants, but SEED-009_VAR_033 (RRLPRPGYMPRP) has Met at
position 9. Corrected to:
- VAR_033: Met×1 at position 9 — Nle substitution + HPLC purity +
  −80°C inert-atmosphere storage (same as SEED-007 protocol); both
  MET×1 and PROLINE_RICH_INTRACELLULAR flags fire simultaneously
- VAR_027/017/039: no Met, no Cys → standard Fmoc SPPS

ROADMAP.md + DISCOVERY_PREDICTION.md: tracking notes for PR #105
(PYROGLUTAMATE_RISK flag) and PR #106 (this correction)
@cschanhniem
cschanhniem merged commit 487ce7a into main Jun 28, 2026
1 check failed
@cschanhniem
cschanhniem deleted the feat/seed009-met-fix-and-tracking branch June 28, 2026 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant