Repository navigation
docs(delivery): review instruction-file changes at tier M - #301
Conversation
CLAUDE.md, .claude/skills/**, and .claude/rules/** change agent behavior, so they now get codex (<= 3 rounds) + /code-review instead of /code-review only. Plain docs outside src/ stay at tier S. Evidence: earlier instruction-file PRs where codex or fresh-review caught real errors (dikw-core #183/#187, dikw-web #116/#142), and the P1 findings hosted Codex raised on the skills in the recent CLAUDE.md split. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe review-tier rules no longer include ChangesReview-tier routing
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Change: Other Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The change routes instruction-file edits through the stronger review process. No actionable merge-blocking risk is established. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
Code reviewNo issues found. Checked for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
Summary
Moves instruction-file changes (
CLAUDE.md,.claude/skills/**,.claude/rules/**) from review tier S to tier M in the delivery skill: they change agent behavior, so they get codex (≤ 3 rounds) +/code-review. Plain docs outsidesrc/stay at tier S.Why: reviewers of the CLAUDE.md split found earlier instruction-file PRs where codex or fresh-review caught real errors (dikw-core #183/#187, dikw-web #116/#142), and hosted Codex raised P1 findings on the skills in that split (#300). Decided by the maintainer after that evidence.
Delivery receipt
Tier: M (this PR changes
.claude/skills/**).| 4 | review | done | codex (1 round); /code-review |
tools/check_doc_refs.py: OK.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
CLAUDE.mdand.claude/**instruction files as tier M, with the Codex and/code-reviewprocess retained.