Skip to content

Conversation

@FlorianK13
Copy link
Member

PR-Assignee

Reviewer

  • 🐙 Follow the Reviewer Guidelines
  • 🐙 Provided feedback and show sufficient appreciation for the work done

@FlorianK13
Copy link
Member Author

@nesnoj These changes were made by some "user" - I think it was someone from RLI. Do you know about this effort to harmonize repositories within the OpenEnergyPlatform. Should we merge this to get a CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md?

@nesnoj
Copy link
Collaborator

nesnoj commented Aug 28, 2024

@nesnoj These changes were made by some "user" - I think it was someone from RLI. Do you know about this effort to harmonize repositories within the OpenEnergyPlatform. Should we merge this to get a CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md?

The git log reveals a mail address and I have a clue..
I will get back to you on this.

@jh-RLI
Copy link

jh-RLI commented Aug 28, 2024

Hi, this was done by @Darynarli who got multiple github accounts and seems to have issues with switching between them i assume :)

Some time ago, she had the task of rolling out a standardised repo structure for the OEF repos. The model was the super-repo, but unfortunately everything fell asleep again. There were a few more problems ... so it wasn't finalised. I had told her to do this in the open-MaStR as well, then it can be decided there whether it makes sense or can be removed again. It would be good to have a slightly more standardised structure, and adding things like CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md is a minor effort that I would vote for.

@FlorianK13
Copy link
Member Author

So I suppose we drop the changes in USERS.cff and README.rst and keep the CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md?

@nesnoj nesnoj mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2024
This reverts commit 7687440.
This reverts commit 6972f96.
This reverts commit c6284b3.
@FlorianK13 FlorianK13 marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2025 06:57
@FlorianK13 FlorianK13 requested a review from nesnoj June 12, 2025 06:58
@Ludee Ludee self-requested a review October 6, 2025 11:22
@Ludee Ludee self-assigned this Oct 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants