Raspberrypi fixes for OpenNi2 #9
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 4 commits
January 30, 2013 21:35
…enabled. Quick fix is to disable file completely
…errypi-fixes Conflicts: Include/Linux-Arm/OniPlatformLinux-Arm.h
SebasRatz
pushed a commit
to SebasRatz/OpenNI2
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Dear OpenNi2-Maintainer(s).
I had given the OpenNi a try for RaspberryPi.
After changing the stuff as seen in this Pull request i was able to run the non-Gui examples with an Xtion.
Could you please integrate it back into your repo, so others could benefit of it?
Things to note:
-> I defined a new Arch Armv6l, which is what uname -m prints. However, its up to you to decide how to call the arch on which the RPi runs.
-> There was a unused but uncompilable USB file which was enabled via an ifdef ARM. I commented it completely with an #if 0. So maybe your #ifdef ARM is not specific enough here (maybe it means android?).
Regards
Hauke