-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
test(epoch): add comprehensive unit tests achieving 95%+ coverage #18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Test coverage highlights: - All epoch transition and phase change logic - Commit-reveal scheme validation and consensus - Weight aggregation and emission distribution - Mechanism weight management and Bittensor integration - Comprehensive edge case handling
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdded extensive unit tests across the epoch crate covering aggregator emissions, commit-reveal flows and manager interactions, epoch config/state, and mechanism weight handling; no public APIs or production logic were modified. Tests total ~1,430 added lines. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~30 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
crates/epoch/src/commit_reveal.rs (3)
609-626: Add assertion to verify cleanup behavior.The test sets up epochs 0, 1, 2 and calls
cleanup_old_epochs(2, 1), but lacks an assertion to verify that epochs 0 and 1 were actually removed. Without verifying the internal state, this test doesn't confirm the cleanup worked correctly.Consider exposing a method to check state count or use
get_or_createto verify which epochs remain.
628-643: Consider adding assertions to verify state creation.This test verifies that
get_or_createcan be called twice without panicking, but doesn't assert that the state was actually created or that subsequent calls return the same state. Adding assertions would make this a more meaningful test.
602-607: Replace trivialassert!(true)with meaningful assertion.
assert!(true)provides no value. Consider asserting on an actual property of the manager.♻️ Suggested improvement
#[test] fn test_commit_reveal_manager_default() { let manager = CommitRevealManager::default(); - // Just verify it can be created - assert!(true); + // Verify initial state + let result = manager.finalize(0, ChallengeId::new(), 0.3, 1); + assert!(result.is_err()); // No commits exist }crates/epoch/src/mechanism_weights.rs (3)
1003-1026: Test assertion expectation may fail for edge case.On line 1025, the test asserts
sum == MAX_WEIGHT as u32, but with very small weights (0.001 * 0.01 emission = 0.00001 scaled weight), the individual weights may round to 0, causing only the burn weight to be added. The burn weight calculation usessaturating_sub, which would giveMAX_WEIGHT - 0 = MAX_WEIGHT, so the assertion should pass. However, line 1023 uses> 0instead of!is_empty().♻️ Minor style improvement
// Should still handle small weights - assert!(mech_weights.uids.len() > 0); + assert!(!mech_weights.uids.is_empty()); let sum: u32 = mech_weights.weights.iter().map(|w| *w as u32).sum(); assert_eq!(sum, MAX_WEIGHT as u32);
1090-1123: Same style nit: prefer!is_empty()overlen() > 0.Lines 1121 uses
uids.len() > 0which is idiomatic but Clippy recommends!is_empty().♻️ Minor style improvement
let (mech_id, uids, weights) = &all[0]; assert_eq!(*mech_id, 5); - assert!(uids.len() > 0); + assert!(!uids.is_empty()); assert_eq!(uids.len(), weights.len());
862-867: Replace trivialassert!(true)with meaningful assertion.Same issue as in commit_reveal.rs - this assertion provides no value.
♻️ Suggested improvement
#[test] fn test_mechanism_commit_reveal_manager_default() { let manager = MechanismCommitRevealManager::default(); - // Just verify it can be created - assert!(true); + // Verify initial state + assert!(!manager.all_revealed()); + assert!(manager.get_all_commitments().is_empty()); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
crates/epoch/src/aggregator.rscrates/epoch/src/commit_reveal.rscrates/epoch/src/lib.rscrates/epoch/src/manager.rscrates/epoch/src/mechanism_weights.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
crates/epoch/src/manager.rs (1)
crates/epoch/src/lib.rs (2)
default(43-52)new(95-103)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Test
🔇 Additional comments (4)
crates/epoch/src/lib.rs (1)
158-198: LGTM!Clean unit tests covering the core types' defaults, display formatting, equality, and initialization. The assertions correctly match the implementation.
crates/epoch/src/aggregator.rs (1)
293-570: LGTM!Comprehensive test coverage for the weight aggregator including edge cases like zero emission, missing weights, empty challenges, and validator metrics. The tests correctly validate expected behavior and error conditions.
crates/epoch/src/manager.rs (1)
256-483: LGTM!Thorough test coverage for the epoch manager including phase transitions, block calculations, and edge cases like multi-epoch jumps. The tests correctly validate the state machine behavior.
crates/epoch/src/mechanism_weights.rs (1)
593-1137: Overall: Excellent test coverage.The tests comprehensively cover edge cases including zero/negative weights, missing hotkeys, UID 0 handling, emission clamping, rounding behavior, and the complete commit-reveal workflow. Good job exercising the various code paths.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
crates/epoch/src/commit_reveal.rs (1)
326-326: Remove unused import.The
Arcimport is not used anywhere in the test module.♻️ Proposed fix
- use std::sync::Arc;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
crates/epoch/src/commit_reveal.rscrates/epoch/src/mechanism_weights.rs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Clippy
🔇 Additional comments (2)
crates/epoch/src/commit_reveal.rs (1)
394-729: Excellent test coverage!This comprehensive test suite thoroughly exercises the commit-reveal implementation, covering happy paths, error conditions, edge cases, and manager lifecycle. The tests validate:
- Epoch and challenge validation
- Duplicate submission prevention
- Missing commitment/reveal handling
- Validator threshold enforcement
- Multi-challenge scenarios
- Cleanup operations
- Error message formatting
This aligns well with the PR's goal of achieving 95%+ test coverage.
crates/epoch/src/mechanism_weights.rs (1)
594-1138: Outstanding comprehensive test coverage!This extensive test suite provides thorough coverage of the mechanism weight management system, including:
- Emission weight edge cases (zero, full, clamping)
- Hotkey-to-UID mapping and fallback behavior
- UID 0 (burn address) handling
- Weight calculation accuracy and rounding
- Commit-reveal workflow (matching/mismatched reveals, missing commitments)
- Manager operations (registration, submission, retrieval, cleanup)
- Multi-mechanism and multi-challenge scenarios
- Complete end-to-end workflow validation
The tests systematically cover edge cases and integration scenarios, strongly supporting the PR's 95%+ coverage goal.
Test coverage highlights:
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.