Skip to content

chore(release): pin Intel UAR sidecar payload - #26

Merged
GQAdonis merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/agent-fabric-c09-intel-payload
Sep 29, 2026
Merged

GQAdonis merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/agent-fabric-c09-intel-payload

Conversation

@GQAdonis

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Branch strategy

  • Active development targets main.

What this PR does

Before this PR:

The v2.2.7 UAR payload manifest covered Windows x64/ARM64 and Apple Silicon. Intel macOS had no pinned native sidecar record.

After this PR:

The Intel entry points to the immutable p1.23 archive built from UAR 94545d52, while the default UAR pin and the three published platforms remain unchanged.

Fixes # N/A

Why we need it and why it was done in this way

The following tradeoffs were made:

Intel uses a platform-specific source override because its ort/tract build fix landed after the frozen C09.2 UAR source.

The following alternatives were considered:

Moving the default UAR source would invalidate the already published platform records, so it was not used.

Links to places where the discussion took place: None

Breaking changes

None.

Special notes for your reviewer

The published Intel record is boss-sidecar-darwin-x64-v1.0.0-p1.23; its archive SHA-256 is a2c04ecbbb34d673df4e039442cc6a5efef842af9123958f33a0c324464d0c15. The importer fetched and validated that record. This PR does not rebuild the three published installers.

Checklist

Release note

NONE

Assisted-by: OpenAI Codex GPT-6 [GitHub release tooling]
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 29, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-29T00:21:41.306251Z e618e82 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@GQAdonis
GQAdonis merged commit 27291c7 into main Sep 29, 2026
13 of 14 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e618e82827

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

"revision": "d3d768636b46bd7b7cea29fba4987aa1754f8352"
"revision": "d3d768636b46bd7b7cea29fba4987aa1754f8352",
"platformRevisions": {
"darwin-x64": "94545d52e6d574b88f8b7cdc91276b4b4b6b8c97"

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Honor the Darwin source override in payload builds

When integration-payload.yml runs with native_tools omitted, it builds every recipe, including uar-sidecar, but scripts/build-integration-tools.cjs checks out only pin.revision (d3d768…) and never consults this new platformRevisions entry. The Darwin x64 job therefore publishes a sidecar built from d3d768… alongside a generated manifest claiming source 94545…; release documentation then directs operators to download and commit that manifest. Either exclude the externally imported sidecar from native payload publication or make checkout select the platform-specific revision.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant